Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 102 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 24 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.1.35 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 1.1.35, updated 2026-10-23.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Tap a Hound piece to select it, then tap a destination to move it.
Trap a Hare so it cannot move in any direction — this counts as a capture.
You can then remove that Hare from the board.
Corner all the Hares and prove yourself a master hunter!
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 11 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange and 7 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:bc49806b8a2e3d4ce5ab1884a7a77cc572dc9d714fc9b744a7ef582ddeea3d14Aggressive ad load: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 11 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:bc49806b8a2e3d4ce5ab1884a7a77cc572dc9d714fc9b744a7ef582ddeea3d14The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:bc49806b8a2e3d4ce5ab1884a7a77cc572dc9d714fc9b744a7ef582ddeea3d14102 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
best game ever, ads suck, just setup a one time paywall, i dont want to see unskippable videos. do you understand how annoying it is? thanks for the game.
I can handle ads, but after every level is extreme.
Forced ads are unbearable, literally after every round despite already having on-screen ads
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.1.35, scanned 24 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.1.35 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 1.1.35, updated 2026-10-23.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
hunter-s-trapAssessed 2026-10-24 from 102 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.