Explore breathtaking landscapes, track elusive animals, and hone your shootin…
HypGames.From our automated analysis, 18 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.05.03 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-18 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.05.03, updated 2026-10-05.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Explore breathtaking landscapes, track elusive animals, and hone your shooting skills in this action-packed game. Whether you’re a seasoned hunter or a novice, this game offers a realistic and immersive hunting adventure that will keep you on the edge of your seat.
Enjoy seamless hunting with no breaks in the action, all in portrait mode. Progress through the game by winning events, unlocking new tours and tournaments, and upgrading your weapons. Collect power-ups and ammo to improve your chances and dominate the leaderboards.
Key Features:
• Stunning 3D Environments 🌲: Hunt in realistic forests, mountains, and savannas with dynamic weather effects and times of day.
• Varied Wildlife 🦌: Target a wide range of animals, from deer to big game, including lions, elephants, and more.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:ceb92d21e79aeeed14c274c84d00025b1bfd7e54713011b0dae8521424cbded4Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (0.9% of 672 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:ceb92d21e79aeeed14c274c84d00025b1bfd7e54713011b0dae8521424cbded4Pay to progress: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.2% of 672 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
672 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I am highly disappointed in this game because within a few minutes I was thrown straight into an ad and I could not get out of the ad. People play games to play it and not be forced to watch ads.
Horrible experience. Forced ads to get anything done, game play is built around spending and it has no logic! Even the info doesnt make sense, there is no damage stat! If you're going to respond to me devs, say the word "Apples" so I know…
TOO MANY ADS!!!! not getting any play time
buy buy buy to win win win, just like all the others, I'm poor i can't buy buy buy in a silly game! so i guess I'll just lose to all the MONEY POCKETS OUT THERE, I WAS BRAGGING on HOW THIS GAME WAS MORE FUN THAN "HUNTING SNIPER" but now…
Fun game so far, but it is a pay to win game as you progress as its not easy to get the top tier guns, ammo, and upgrades unless you're buying them.
pretty fun, you will have to spend money to get anywhere beyond maybe the 3rd level but still fun
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 3.05.03, scanned 18 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.05.03 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-18 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 3.05.03, updated 2026-10-05.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
hunting-battle-google-com-miniclip-ultimatehuntingAssessed 2026-10-18 from 672 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.