“hi, it's really nice and fun game , I like this but I have some problem with this game at the first the games going to the pay to win, second is I send 2 mail to the game support but didn't get any mail of them, and last problem is the…”
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 429 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-05.
4.6 ★381,428 ratings
50M+Downloads
12+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases
About this app
The 2026 hunting season is in full swing! Dust off your gun, travel to hunting locations, and observe animals in their natural habitat. Ready to hunt? Let’s play Hunting Clash - a next-generation hunting simulator & shooting game!
Breathtaking shooting areas Visit hunting locations: hunt in the woods of Montana, in the freezing forest of Kamchatka, go on a hunting safari in Africa! Stunning views and realistic animals like in no other hunting games offline! Feel the thrill of a big game hunter marksman in the free hunting game like never before! It’s much more than other free sniper games online.
A sniper shooting game on your mobile Track animals - deer, elk, grizzly bear, wolf, duck and many more. Choose an animal, prepare your gun, aim and shoot! Big buck hunter games are a combination of hunting games offline and sniper games genres.…
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
The evidence behind this assessment
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
This analysis describes version 5.38.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 5.38.1, updated 2026-09-29.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
From the package we downloaded and read — version 5.38.1, scanned 2026-10-03.
Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
None requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
3–9 found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Multiple ad networks bundled
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 9 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager) and 5 more
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
One source only — shown, not confirmed 1
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.4% of 429 reviews scanned)
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“pay to win the game, after certain levels you can't complete the event without paying money 😡”
“It's a good game for when I'm bored and need to kill time, but it's far too pay-to-win. Okay, I had to lower the rating, because the devs are getting way too greedy. They string you along with their time-limited events, and then right…”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 5.38.1.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.