Looking for an easy-to-use PDF converter to convert images to PDF?
Efficient ToolsSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.3.6 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.3.6, updated 2026-09-16.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Looking for an easy-to-use PDF converter to convert images to PDF?
Don’t miss this Image to PDF - PDF Maker, a powerful tool that effortlessly converts all images to PDFs! Fast, efficient, and available offline!
With this lightweight app, not only can you convert images to PDFs, but also read and edit PDFs on the go! Its intuitive and clean interface ensures quick access to all the features you need.
# Image to PDF - PDF Maker is:
📕 Image to PDF Converter
- Easily convert images in various formats (jpg, jpeg, png, etc.) to PDFs.
- One-click share your PDFs via email, social media, Bluetooth, etc.
- Smart scan to convert essential files (assignments, contracts, receipts, forms, etc.) into high-quality PDFs.
- Adjust images with cropping, filters, drawing, and text for the best PDF output.
- Import PDFs directly from your device for easy viewing, editing, and sharing.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 4 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), InMobi, Meta Audience Network, Pangle (ByteDance)
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:f3ae26ddad5d39715885c639482d3b14137eeb7c0bfde5ee0cb605fc1c8fa4caAggressive ad load: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 80 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "%s pages have premium filters applied. Remove the filters to continue."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:f3ae26ddad5d39715885c639482d3b14137eeb7c0bfde5ee0cb605fc1c8fa4caPurchase screen steers the choice: "Best Value"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:f3ae26ddad5d39715885c639482d3b14137eeb7c0bfde5ee0cb605fc1c8fa4caThe app's own text says: "The file will no longer be protected."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Package artefact
sha256:f3ae26ddad5d39715885c639482d3b14137eeb7c0bfde5ee0cb605fc1c8fa4caThe app's own text says: "I need more time to try the app"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:f3ae26ddad5d39715885c639482d3b14137eeb7c0bfde5ee0cb605fc1c8fa4caThe app's own text says: "Hey! Try %1$s - a simple PDF converter that easily converts images to PDFs, offline available and %2$s free! Give it a try now!"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:f3ae26ddad5d39715885c639482d3b14137eeb7c0bfde5ee0cb605fc1c8fa4ca400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
pretty useful and easy, too much adds tho
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.3.6, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.3.6 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.3.6, updated 2026-09-16.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
image-to-pdf-google-imagetopdf-pdfmaker-pdfconverter-pdfreaderAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.