Some warnings 19 users report a free trial turning into a charge; 16 users report trouble cancelling. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 500 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.3.8 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.3.8, updated 2026-08-25.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
A science-based ADHD app for focus, productivity, and daily life. Manage your ADHD in just 5 minutes a day!
Inflow is designed by people with ADHD, for people with ADHD. We are not a glorified timer or calendar. Inflow is a science-based program designed to help you manage focus, procrastination, and follow-through in a way that works with your brain, not against it. Developed with clinical psychologists and featured in peer-reviewed research.
DOES THIS SOUND LIKE YOU?
Do you struggle with focus, organization, or procrastination? Does "task paralysis" stop you from starting simple chores? Have you abandoned planners and trackers in the past? ADHD doesn’t have to hold you back. Inflow can help.
WHY INFLOW?
Inflow is based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) principles.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Trial converts to a charge: raised by 19 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 26 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The free trial demands a payment method up front and/or rolls into a paid subscription with no usable warning.
Hard to cancel: raised by 16 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 31 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
500 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Shady — They will charge you even though you canceled within the allotted free trial period (and show this to them with a screen shot) - that they really emphasize as an extra detail of giving folks with ADHD this time - then tell you…
Scammers — I tried the free trial and canceled it, then a year later they charged me for year subscription without my consent. I am disputing their charge now but I will only change my review if they refund their charge.
7-day free trial not honored — The app stated in the App Store that I would be given a 7-day free trial, but my card was charged for a 1 year subscription immediately after signing up. Was this a technical glitch or a purposeful attempt…
Unable to Cancel — I canceled inflow 2 years ago. I have been unable to get them to stop charging me for 3 years now. This is a scam, do not download!
Disappointed — I’ve contacted these people several times to cancel my subscription and I have yet to get a response. I need somebody to reply back to me and refund me my money because I’m tired of constantly reaching out and getting no…
Don’t Fall For It — Or for the good reviews, because I have no idea how anyone could leave this app a good review. For $200 you get very small very basic chunks that I wouldn’t even call knowledge. And useless quizzes. Not worth the price…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.3.8 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.3.8, updated 2026-08-25.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Dark mode is here! Enjoy a more comfortable look, day or night.
Appworthy
inflowAssessed 2026-10-27 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.