Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 427 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.

Ingress

Niantic Spatial Inc

Welcome to Ingress, Agent.

4.1 ★438,805 ratings
10M+Downloads
4+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases

About this app

Welcome to Ingress, Agent. The world around you is not what it seems.

The discovery of Exotic Matter (XM) has sparked a covert struggle between two Factions: the Enlightened and the Resistance. Cutting-edge XM technologies have completely transformed the Ingress Scanner, and it is now waiting for you to join this global battle. _______________

🌎 THE WORLD IS YOUR GAME Explore the world around you and interact with places of cultural significance, such as public art installations, landmarks, and monuments, to collect valuable resources using your Ingress Scanner.

🏃 CHOOSE A SIDE Fight for the Faction you believe in. Harness the power of XM to evolve mankind and discover our true destiny with The Enlightened, or protect humanity from a hostile takeover of the mind with The Resistance.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
Ingress screenshot 1
Ingress screenshot 2
Ingress screenshot 3
Ingress screenshot 4
Ingress screenshot 5
Ingress screenshot 6
Ingress screenshot 7
Ingress screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

Evidence and review signals

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated analysis in progress

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

We cannot tell which version of the app this analysis describes. It was run 2026-10-04 , and the app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 3.15.1, updated 2026-09-22.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 3.15.1, scanned 2026-10-05.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
6 or more requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

Context 1

Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.

Asks for more sensitive permissions than similar apps
MeasuredPublished as context — deliberately not a charge · from the app manifestartefact fe91c89f5c98…
The package requests substantially more of the device's sensitive permissions than the typical app in its category. This is a measurement, not an accusation: a permission is granted because a feature needs it, and a wide request list is a reason to look rather than a finding on its own.
What we saw: Requests 8 sensitive permissions (ACCESS_BACKGROUND_LOCATION, ACCESS_COARSE_LOCATION, ACCESS_FINE_LOCATION, ACTIVITY_RECOGNITION, CAMERA, READ_CONTACTS, READ_EXTERNAL_STORAGE, RECORD_AUDIO); the median for 55 scanned apps in Adventure is 0

Positive evidence 2

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

No advertising SDKs
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact fe91c89f5c98…
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
What we saw: No advertising or mediation SDK among the 6 SDKs detected in the package
Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 2

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 9 distinct reviewers (2.1% of 427 reviews scanned)
In the app's own text: Hard to cancel
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is the app's own on-screen text.artefact fe91c89f5c98…
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
What we saw: Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Pay to progress
“I love the Game but its is Pay to Win. Nothing is done about cheaters with duplicate accounts. And it is not possible anymore to report them. And now have made it not easy to report.”
1★ · Google Play · 2025-10-27
Pay to progress
“Used to be pretty amazing back in the day, now they push p2w in your face and don't really do much about multi-acc backpackers, esp if they've got a subscription going, from what I've seen, they just get warned, but no actual punishments…”
3★ · Google Play · 2026-05-11
Pay to progress
“Garbage interface. Constant overlay in the way. Not anything like the original ingress that I was one of the original players and supporters. Edit: Now they started with pop-ups for trying to sell pay to win stuff. no thanks.”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-01-16

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 3.15.1.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.