Inner Child: Human Design offers a detailed numerology calculator, zodiac sig…
Mulex LLCSerious warnings 3 confirmed warnings. Checked: 27 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.8.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 1.8.2, updated 2026-10-14.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Inner Child: Human Design offers a detailed numerology calculator, zodiac sign chart and personalized natal chart horoscope based on the Human Design, astrology and Gene Keys spiritual systems. With this app, you can restore a deep connection with your inner self and unlock your soul's destiny.
✨ EXPLORE THE KNOWLEDGE WE RELY ON: Our app integrates ancient astrological knowledge, present-day psychology, natal chart astrology, the I Ching, Kabbalah and Vedic traditions, and Human Design philosophy (which the Gene Keys system is also based on). This new approach to astrology focuses on 5 energy types said to define each unique personality and how it exchanges energy with the world. It offers a more detailed and personalized way of understanding the truth about yourself and others.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
The store privacy disclosure (1 entry) names no tracking or advertising use, but the package ships 9 advertising/tracking SDKs: AppLovin MAX, AppMetrica, AppsFlyer, Firebase Analytics
Tracking or advertising SDKs are present in the package that the store's own privacy disclosure does not account for.
Bundles 5 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: AppLovin MAX, Fyber / Digital Turbine Exchange, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), ironSource / Unity LevelPlay and 1 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:73b2ecc40bc6b46df9da494d4c9dae3bba3c74709094f19ddd449c7629522ce0Paywall is server-configured and A/B tested via Adapty — the offer shown can differ per user
The app ships a remote paywall-experimentation SDK, so the offer shown is configured server-side and may differ per user — including from anything we or a reviewer saw.
Package artefact
sha256:73b2ecc40bc6b46df9da494d4c9dae3bba3c74709094f19ddd449c7629522ce0Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Offers a free trial ("Free trial") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:73b2ecc40bc6b46df9da494d4c9dae3bba3c74709094f19ddd449c7629522ce0The app's own text says: "path(M 0,0 C 0.05, 0, 0.133333, 0.06, 0.166666, 0.4 C 0.208333, 0.82, 0.25, 1, 1, 1)"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:73b2ecc40bc6b46df9da494d4c9dae3bba3c74709094f19ddd449c7629522ce0No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.8.2, scanned 24 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.8.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 1.8.2, updated 2026-10-14.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
inner-childAssessed 2026-10-25 from 27 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.