Introducing Inspect and Edit HTML Live An application which can change style…
Brain VaultSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.75 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 2.75, updated 2023-04-11.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Introducing Inspect and Edit HTML Live
An application which can change style and layout in real-time.
List of features:
✔️️ Inspect elements - touch a web element to view the source code
✔️️ Edit website source code
✔️️ Inject javascript into the given webpage
✔️️ View html source code
✔️️ Change the css style of various web elements
🔹 Inspect and edit website source code
This application allows you to do similar things to what other live websites source code editors do on desktop.
🔹 Learn HTML and CSS
Inspect and Edit HTML Live can be used to learn web development technologies such as CSS.
🔹 Please note
The code changed on any website will only be stored locally on your device, therefore it will disappear after the page refresh.
DO NOT USE THIS APPLICATION TO DO STUFF THAT YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO DO. THE DEVELOPER IS IN NO WAY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY MISUSE OF THIS APPLICATION
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 10 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: AdColony, Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Appodeal and 6 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:ce38bdecc635eba53c354a9479acd471a618a6917bf6281d57db6d1e46b49f43Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch a video to earn a reward!"
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:ce38bdecc635eba53c354a9479acd471a618a6917bf6281d57db6d1e46b49f43Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "View the ad you saved when you were offline"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:ce38bdecc635eba53c354a9479acd471a618a6917bf6281d57db6d1e46b49f43The app's own text says: "Looks like you have reached limit of 20 edits, please purchase in-app product to remove the limit or watch an video ad to reset it"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:ce38bdecc635eba53c354a9479acd471a618a6917bf6281d57db6d1e46b49f43Offers a trial ("and") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:ce38bdecc635eba53c354a9479acd471a618a6917bf6281d57db6d1e46b49f43400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
No sampled quote is attached to this observation.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.75, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.75 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 2.75, updated 2023-04-11.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
inspect-and-edit-html-liveAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.