Some warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.23 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 2.23, updated 2026-08-30.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
How smart are you? Take a complete IQ-style test, discover your estimated score, and challenge yourself with brain games designed around logic, memory, focus, math, and reasoning.
TAKE THE IQ TEST
Start with the complete 40-question IQ-style test for a more detailed result, or choose a shorter quiz when you only have a few minutes. Different question types challenge the way you recognize patterns, work with numbers, solve problems, and reason under pressure.
Your score is an approximate estimate intended for personal use, practice, and entertainment. You can repeat tests, become familiar with the formats, and compare your results over time.
TRAIN YOUR BRAIN
Go beyond a single intelligence test with a varied collection of mental exercises and quick games. Practice key skills through:…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 3 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), Unity Ads, Vungle / Liftoff Monetize
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:2824238a24b9f3adb823ce201db15693091eddae8a632a8c242eee90285045d5Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 18 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 22 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:2824238a24b9f3adb823ce201db15693091eddae8a632a8c242eee90285045d5The app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:2824238a24b9f3adb823ce201db15693091eddae8a632a8c242eee90285045d5400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
it's good. sometimes it got too easy, but sometimes the puzzle is that challenging just too many ads tho 😄. but it's still fine and understandable
A lot of ads every 1 minute an ad comes and the timer is really slow and there is less time
good stuff, hard questions relative to the other iq games i found, but so many ads
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.23, scanned 28 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.23 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 2.23, updated 2026-08-30.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
We’ve improved the IQ test and added more content to make the experience more complete and challenging. There are also 4 new brain training games, featuring challenges in memory, logic, maths, and concentration. We’ve also fixed bugs and improved the app’s overall performance.
No release notes were provided for this version.
iq-test-apple-1644378921Assessed 2026-10-30 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.