No specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 13 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 4.40.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-13 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 4.40.5, updated 2026-09-24.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
iScape is the No. 1 app for landscape design. We are here to help you create beautiful outdoor living areas. Whether you’re an Industry Professional, or a DIY Homeowner, iScape has you covered.
As featured in Forbes, HGTV, HBO, The New York Times, USA Today, Fox, and many more!
“If you’re DIY’ing it, iScape makes it easy to plan out what to buy and how to put it all together. If you’re hiring a landscaper, the app can help you explore ideas and share your vision.” - Forbes
"It is user friendly and has features that include a virtual pen, the ability to insert objects and more. This is considered one of the best landscape design apps." - Borst Landscape Design
"Wish you could see how your home would look with professional landscaping? With iScape, you can create a digital model of your home's yard.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 32 distinct reviewers (6.4% of 501 reviews scanned)
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
501 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 32 distinct reviewers — 6.4% of the 501 reviews scanned on this store leg (App Store).
Everything is locked — Can’t even do nothing without buying a subscription
Too locked down to evaluate — Tried to use it, but got constant, expensive subscription upsell prompts. Practically everything is locked behind membership, so no real ability to see if anything actually works. Looks like more AI slopware…
IT’S NOT FREE!!! — You can’t do anything on the app without paying $30/month.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 4.40.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-13 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 4.40.5, updated 2026-09-24.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Thanks for using iScape! This update brings Street View back, better than before: * Fixed: Street View image picker now loads reliably * New: Street View is now available on Mac * New: Crop your Street View shot to 1:1, 4:3, or 16:9 * Stability and performance improvements We look forward to your feedback!
Appworthy
iscape-apple-439688430Assessed 2026-10-13 from 501 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.