💎 You will take an adventure with Magic Emma, use the power of jewels to sav…
BuildFun - Jewel Games StarSome warnings 6 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 391 reviews.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.56.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 1.56.1, updated 2026-10-09.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
💎 You will take an adventure with Magic Emma, use the power of jewels to save the magic farm.
💎 The game is simple but full of fun. Just swap to make 3 matching and blast all the jewels.
💎 Feel bored? Jewel Blast Dream is the best free match 3 game to pass the boring time, keep your brain active and relieve stress.
👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑
Features:
💎 Unique & Fantastic 💎
- The graphics are bright in color.
- A variety of beautiful and shining jewels.
- Fantastic blast effects.
😄 Simple & Fun 😄
- Feed the pets, save the animals and save the magic farm with Emma.
- Entertaining puzzles appear frequently.
🏆 Hundreds Of Elaborate Levels 🏆
- Every puzzle is designed elaborately.
- Clearing the puzzles is really a relief from daily stress.
🎁 Variety Of Free Gifts 🎁
- Lucky Spin, Star Chest, Challenge Treasure...
- Matching to win them all!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 65 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
391 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
No longer great. The last update removed the option to watch an ad in exchange for three more turns on a level. It's far more difficult to complete many levels now, and not as much fun, so I'm looking for the next King again. Update: The…
this many ads and you want us to pay to remove ads I will be deleting this game I HIGHLY RECOMMEND YOU DONT DOWNLOAD THIS GAME IF YOU DONT LIKE ADS THERE WAY TO MANY ADS
Used to be a fun game. The ads were short and not invasive. Since the new update it's constant ads and is more glitchy now. Greed always ruins the good games. :(
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.56.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 1.56.1, updated 2026-10-09.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
jewel-blast-dreamAssessed 2026-10-25 from 391 user reviews. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. One independent signal is read — user reviews — and each candidate finding is filed under the source that supports it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.