Jewel Story💎 Match, Combine, Blast!👏 Enjoy the magic moment!✨ To be No…
LinkDesks - Jewel Games StarSome warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.6.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.6.0, updated 2026-07-30.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Jewel Story💎
Match, Combine, Blast!👏
Enjoy the magic moment!✨
To be No.1 among friends!👫
-----------------------------------------------------------------
❓HOW TO PLAY TOP JEWEL STORY MANIA
★ Drag and drop the jewel to the grid.
★ Match 3 jewels in a row or column, you will get merged gems.
★ Tap the jewel to rotate before dropping it.
★ Get more merged jewels and create diamonds.
★ Match 3 of them to make big jewel blast.
★ Unlimited crush and fun! Win the jewel star.
★ Merge jewels reaching different level target. Get more rewards!
👏FEATURES OF BEST JEWEL STORY MANIA
★ Easy to learn and play.
★ Suitable for all ages.
★ No WIFI needed. You can play with jewels online and offline.
★ Amazing sound and visual effects.
★ No time limits in this free jewel quest.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 3 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), Meta Audience Network, Unity Ads
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:8f24c44bda8aab1a22fb442513065fa3f01275b8962b621e030ac901a1853324Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:8f24c44bda8aab1a22fb442513065fa3f01275b8962b621e030ac901a1853324No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.6.0, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.6.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.6.0, updated 2026-07-30.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
jewel-storyAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.