Some warnings 25 users report unexpected charges; 13 users report trouble cancelling and 1 more report. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 426 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 5.5.8 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 5.5.8, updated 2026-10-15.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Want to learn a language fast? With our immersive language learning method, you can learn Spanish, French, English, Italian, German, Korean, Japanese and 20 languages by speaking confidently in real-life conversations. Join over 1 million learners who trust Jumpspeak's language lessons designed by top language learning experts.
Planning to travel and need to learn Spanish? Want a better job and want to learn English or German? Have friends living abroad and need to learn French?
With Jumpspeak, you'll gain instant confidence to learn French, Spanish, English, Korean, German, Russian & more.
TRY JUMPSPEAK™ - DOWNLOAD AND TAKE A FREE LANGUAGE LESSON.
==========
LANGUAGES FOR YOU TO LEARN:
We're not just a Spanish learning app! Learn up to 20 languages with 1 membership.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "Lifetime Access"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:8c81eacbdfbd0fc7a3077cdcb9b4b9f30324996ad4857227568c45da146385c7No advertising or mediation SDK among the 7 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
sha256:8c81eacbdfbd0fc7a3077cdcb9b4b9f30324996ad4857227568c45da146385c7The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Misleading advertising: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 61 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Surprise charges: raised by 25 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 17 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Hard to cancel: raised by 13 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 33 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
426 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
It neglects to actually teach you any french. You mainly just read sentences written out for you and AI judges you on your pronunciation, but you have no idea what you just said. Then sometimes some words are blurred out, and you're…
Update: don't look at the reply, I messaged them and they can't help so the initial review still stands Beware upgrading your subscription. I started with premium but saw there was a deal to upgrade to premium AI. In any other app this…
APPALLING APP, AND DON'T EXPECT ANY HELP FROM CUSTOMER SERVICE. if I could give 0 stars I would. I tried to refund an unwanted and unexpected renewal. No notification before payment taken. Contacted them within the stated 24 hours - and…
App itself was terrible compared to others on the market, worse is that they have hidden charges and even after I cancelled they still kept charging me. DO NOT GIVE THEM YOUR BANK DETAILS
I thought I had canceled my account after an initial trial period. I was charged for another 4 quarters of usage. I did not see the charges on my statement. Incredibly difficult to cancel a subscription. No clear path to cancellation. Had…
the app is ok, but it's impossible to cancel the subscription!
Scam! Finding your subscription to cancel it is impossible if you don't go through stripe! They don't have a clear way to reach support. Also the app is garbage if you actually want to learn a language.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 5.5.8, scanned 22 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 5.5.8 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 5.5.8, updated 2026-10-15.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
- Bug fixes and performance improvements
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
jumpspeakAssessed 2026-10-30 from 426 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.