Some warnings 8 users report trouble cancelling. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 303 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.16.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.16.0, updated 2026-10-23.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Make Stretching a Daily Habit for a Healthier You
Welcome to JustStretch, your go-to app for making stretching a seamless part of your daily routine. Our app is designed to help you enhance your flexibility and maintain your natural range of motion, no matter your age or fitness level.
JustStretch Routines:
- "Morning Energizer": Kickstart your day with stretches that boost energy and prepare your body for the day ahead.
- "Desk Break": Counteract the effects of sitting with these seated stretches that target the shoulders, back, and neck.
- "Full Body Flow": A comprehensive routine that targets key muscles and joints throughout your entire body.
- "Relax & Unwind": Gentle stretches to help you relax and prepare for a restful night's sleep.
- "Flexibility Challenge": Advanced routines for those looking to push their flexibility to new heights.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Hard to cancel: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 38 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
303 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
No Way to Cancel — Beware. Once you sign up there is no easy way to cancel.
This is a scam you cannot cancel subscription — First of all, it’s hard to find where to cancel subscription. But finally, I found it and months ago I sent email requesting cancellation. They replied acknowledging my request. And guess…
BEWARE: there is no way to cancel this subscription!! You will be billed $70 a month after trial end — Right before the trial had ended I decided this app was not for me. There is no place within the app or website to simply cancel the…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.16.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.16.0, updated 2026-10-23.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
- Added a variety of new stretching courses for different scenarios. - Optimized experience for smoother usage.
Appworthy
juststretchAssessed 2026-10-27 from 303 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.