Some warnings 10 users report the basics being behind a paywall. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 408 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.34.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 2.34.0, updated 2026-09-16.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
New cars, stickers, wheels and other improvements! Now it is much funnier to create unique cars for the race, drive faster than lightning, and cross obstacles on the road!
With this exciting app children can enjoy beeping, accelerating and jumping on trampolines as they ride on different vehicles. For some added fun, the game also includes interactive objects on the way for kids to click. Set off on an exciting journey with your friend - racer Raccoon!
Features of the app:
· Travel to 6 new different locations
· Choose from different high-speed cars
· Paint or improve your cars in a garage
· Paste bright and funny car stickers
· Enjoy this easy and fun-to-play game
· Listen to the stunning sound effects and music
· Delight yourself with the funny cartoon graphics
· Play without internet
This entertaining game is suitable for kids aged 1 year and above.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 1 SDK detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:18ecfcde4d2ecfaad858c42655b26e3b5cbaf979453bbda860c192ee4e4ba8deThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Sign in"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:18ecfcde4d2ecfaad858c42655b26e3b5cbaf979453bbda860c192ee4e4ba8deThe app's own text says: "Download Completed"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:18ecfcde4d2ecfaad858c42655b26e3b5cbaf979453bbda860c192ee4e4ba8dePaywall blocks the basics: raised by 10 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 41 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
408 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
upsetting for toddler. I downloaded a simple game like many other toddler car games. however the only choice in cars is a basic yellow car. lots of fancy others, fire trucks, holiday vehicles.. but they're all locked behind a pay gate…
its ok but got to pay for everything ok for kids but the adds ant
everything is locked. way too many ads
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.34.0, scanned 20 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.34.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 2.34.0, updated 2026-09-16.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
We've fixed bugs and improved performance, ensuring a fun, seamless experience for your little ones. Don't forget to leave us feedback so we can keep improving!
No release notes were provided for this version.
kids-car-gamesAssessed 2026-10-30 from 408 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.