Embark on a laid-back yet engaging journey through a captivating medieval rea…
CreauctopusSome warnings 18 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 31 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.1.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 3.1.2, updated 2026-10-27.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Embark on a laid-back yet engaging journey through a captivating medieval realm in "King's Landing - Idle Arcade," a mobile game that seamlessly blends strategic resource management with the casual enjoyment of an idle arcade experience. As the esteemed ruler of a budding kingdom, your journey to dominance has never been so relaxed!
🏰 Build Your Castle:
Construct and customize your majestic castle at your own pace. Experiment with layouts and designs, choosing from a variety of medieval structures to create your unique stronghold. Witness the evolution of your kingdom as it transforms into an impressive empire while you enjoy the ease of an idle arcade setting.
🌍 Explore a Rich World!
Embark on an automated exploration of a visually stunning medieval world filled with enchanting landscapes, mysterious forests, and daunting mountains.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 18 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 22 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Ive played other games similar to this and enjoyed them but the ads were always so horrendous it made them unplayable. This game is definitely worth downloading and I can't wait until it has some more levels added keep up the great work!…
I tried this game in early release and really liked it. There were no forced ads, and the optional ads for rewards were very reasonable. Later, it updated and started doing forced ads, so I dropped my review to 3 stars and uninstalled. I…
I'm a big gamer. But I dare say it's one of the best. Because it makes your mind think. I just hope this isn't the whole story, because I see a lot of potential in it, since from the very beginning of the game, the most minor options can…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.1.2 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-31 .
The store currently lists version 3.1.2, updated 2026-10-27.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
king-s-landingAssessed 2026-10-31 from 400 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.