[Special Rewards] 404 Draws, Character Skin, Random Orange Hero, and Limited…
Joy Nice GamesSome warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 104 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 24 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.10000.97 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 1.10000.97, updated 2026-10-12.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
[Special Rewards] 404 Draws, Character Skin, Random Orange Hero, and Limited Decor!
When your city becomes the hunting ground for ghosts and monsters... "Knock, knock." Someone's knocking on your door...
"Shh, don't make a sound, and don't open the door."
Creatures from age-old tales and urban legends are trying to break into your house. Your job? Close the door and defend it with your heroes as your heart pounds with excitement and no fear.
Schools, hospitals, hotels, streets, and office buildings—the most mundane locations become thrill-filled tower defense challenges. Get ready for stunning visuals and smooth controls in 5-minute matches!
[Five Main Features to Define New Horror Tower Defense]…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 6 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: AppLovin MAX, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), ironSource / Unity LevelPlay, Meta Audience Network and 2 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:1936f3ba6ee5c75cecdedbb8d861371b0b25f77c2f353f1ccfb3663d0766059cSpecific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Pay to progress: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 21 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
The app's own text says: "Finish playing to get rewards"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:1936f3ba6ee5c75cecdedbb8d861371b0b25f77c2f353f1ccfb3663d0766059c104 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
a nice game but more a p2p rather than the usual p2w, added to the daily demands to allow notifications and the high number of activities requiring you to watch adds (basically forcing you to buy the monthly pass for 30 days of ad skip…
I love room defense games, but it's hard to find one that isn't a garbage heap of ads and/ or ridiculously priced packs for poultry rewards...I am sad to say I am still looking. 2 stars for the concept and character designs. My most…
The game is simple but fun... at least in the beginning. But it is very P2W! If you don't spend - you will have Zero chances in the most of the events. Events are very dependent on the amount of money you spend. I was not a F2P at all…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.10000.97, scanned 24 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.10000.97 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 1.10000.97, updated 2026-10-12.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
knock-knockAssessed 2026-10-24 from 104 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.