“I'm playing this game religiously for the last 8 months.. Here's what i learned! It's 100% pay to win with no skill required if you spent enough. Its extremely expensive, neverending money grab. You can spend tens of thousands of $ and…”
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 1,878 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-05.
4.5 ★890,405 ratings
10M+Downloads
17+Age rating
2218 MBApp size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases
About this app
In an apocalyptic world overrun by the undead, where the fate of humanity hangs in the balance amid diminishing living spaces, will you rise as the hero we need to reshape the destiny of humankind? Uncover the adventure of Last Z: Survival Shooter – your destiny awaits!
Dodge & Shoot In the heart of the zombie-infested apocalypse, survival is not just a choice but an exhilarating stage, challenging the prowess of dodging and shooting skills. Navigate through waves of relentless undead, strategically evading their onslaught while honing your precision shooting. Each dodge and shoot propel you closer to victory, earning you abundant rewards in this thrilling game of wits and reflexes.
Explore & Expand Brace yourself for an adrenaline-fueled journey where the apocalypse is your playground for exploration and expansion.…
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
The evidence behind this assessment
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
App Store
This analysis describes version 1.250.728 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.250.728, updated 2026-09-14.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 1.250.728 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.250.728, updated 2026-09-19.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
65–79% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
From the package we downloaded and read — version 1.250.728, scanned 2026-09-27.
Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
3–5 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
The catch list 1
Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Raised by 29 distinct reviewers — 2.3% of the 1,257 reviews scanned on this store leg (Google Play).
Context 1
Measured and published because a reader would want to know — deliberately not a charge. The measurement alone does not show a harm.
Cheapest and priciest options are far apart
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
What we saw: In-app purchases run from USD 0.99 to USD 99.99 — a 101x spread across 10 items
Positive evidence 2
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
No advertising SDKs
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
What we saw: No advertising or mediation SDK among the 6 SDKs detected in the package
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
One source only — shown, not confirmed 2
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 18 distinct reviewers (2.9% of 621 reviews scanned)
From the store listing: Usable without an account
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
What we saw: The store privacy disclosure (3 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“Fake screenshots. EXTREMELY pay to win. Devs are scumbags that held a members account hostage banning her from communicating with anyone because THEY double charged her and she had no way to get a refund other than to do a charge back…”
“Great game concepts, but completely ruined by greed and broken mechanics. The 'treasure digging' event is unplayable. Players in the US, Europe, China, and Korea have an unbeatable ping advantage, and people openly use auto-clickers. We…”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 1.250.728.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown10
Lowest$0.99
Highest$99.99
Resource Hot Sale 182$4.99
Resource Hot Sale 10$0.99
Resource Hot Sale 647$9.99
Resource Hot Sale 704$19.99
Resource Hot Sale 8$0.99
Show 5 more purchases
Resource Hot Sale 101$4.99
Resource Hot Sale 516$99.99
Resource Hot Sale 417$49.99
Resource Hot Sale 391$24.99
Resource Hot Sale 2$0.99
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.