The PvP MOBA gameplay of League of Legends by Riot Games arrives on mobile in…
Riot Games, IncNothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
From our automated analysis, 5 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 7.3.0.2813 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 7.3.0.2813, updated 2026-09-13.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
The PvP MOBA gameplay of League of Legends by Riot Games arrives on mobile in League of Legends: Wild Rift! Built from the ground up for mobile-first PvP, Wild Rift is a 5v5 multiplayer online battle arena (MOBA) game with exciting action where your skills, strategy, and combat senses are put to the test.
Wild Rift is packed with content and fresh features for the ultimate PvP multiplayer experience. Enjoy fast-paced MOBA combat, real-time strategy, smooth controls, and diverse 5v5 gameplay. Team up with friends, lock in your champion, and play to win! Play together in a thrilling team battle where you test your combat prowess to see who comes out on top.
Competitive 5v5 battles await in League of Legends: Wild Rift. Dive into exciting PvP battles with casual or ranked mode to level up your champions and unlock powerful abilities.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 5 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:280364d12f1880de321f8c6f7b381f75cb7c20000a472a37441f0c73369db20dThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Pay to progress: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (0.5% of 1223 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
1,223 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
This is the best competitive mobile game I've been playing for years and it's only getting better I work a lot and only made it to grandmaster nothing pay to win or progress completely free the only downside is if you play solo sometimes…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 7.3.0.2813, scanned 22 Sep 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 7.3.0.2813 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 7.3.0.2813, updated 2026-09-13.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
league-of-legends-google-com-riotgames-league-wildriftAssessed 2026-10-05 from 1,223 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.