Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 1,516 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-05.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

Riot Games

Competitive 5v5 MOBA Action

3.3 ★2,518,304 ratings
50M+Downloads
12+Age rating
1077 MBApp size
FreeIn-app purchases

About this app

It’s League of Legends by Riot Games, now built from the ground up for mobile PvP battles. Dive into Wild Rift’s fast-paced multiplayer strategy games with smooth controls and endless online battle arena action. Team up with friends in epic PvP gameplay, lock in your champion, and go for the big plays in a legendary multiplayer battle arena. Download League of Legends: Wild Rift and prepare for battle. Ready when you are!…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
League of Legends: Wild Rift screenshot 1
League of Legends: Wild Rift screenshot 2
League of Legends: Wild Rift screenshot 3
League of Legends: Wild Rift screenshot 4
League of Legends: Wild Rift screenshot 5
League of Legends: Wild Rift screenshot 6
League of Legends: Wild Rift screenshot 7
League of Legends: Wild Rift screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

Evidence and review signals

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated analysis in progress

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

App Store

This analysis describes version 2813 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 2813, updated 2026-09-22.

Google Play

This analysis describes version 7.3.0.2813 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-05 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 7.3.0.2813, updated 2026-09-13.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 7.3.0.2813, scanned 2026-09-22.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
3–5 requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
1–2 found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
None found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

Positive evidence 2

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

No advertising SDKs
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact 280364d12f18…
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
What we saw: No advertising or mediation SDK among the 5 SDKs detected in the package
Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 1

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (0.5% of 1223 reviews scanned)

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Pay to progress
“This is the best competitive mobile game I've been playing for years and it's only getting better I work a lot and only made it to grandmaster nothing pay to win or progress completely free the only downside is if you play solo sometimes…”
5★ · Google Play · 2026-09-27
Pay to progress
“No issues anymore for me, but that's probably because I have an above average phone. Very aggressive cosmetic monetization but it's the only way they make money, no p2w at least. If you have a solid phone or like League of Legends on PC…”
5★ · Google Play · 2026-09-22

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 2813.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.