Unleash the Storm of Runes From Asgard's shadows emerges a guardian, A suprem…
Wemade Co., LtdSome warnings 17 users report having to pay to progress. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.35.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.35.5, updated 2026-10-15.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Unleash the Storm of Runes
From Asgard's shadows emerges a guardian,
A supreme striker who shatters the battlefield in defiance of fate.
New Class Update: Rune Fighter
Official Website: https://www.legendofymir.com
▣ Synopsis
A world of Ragnarok that repeats every 9,000 years.
The will to stop Ragnarok is passed down to the chosen ones awakened by fate;
and through endless cycles of reincarnation, a new hero of Ymir shall rise.
A grand tale of heroes who transcend the cycles of rebirth amidst the wars and conflicts between races.
The myth of the land of Ymir shall unfold once more.
▣ Game Features
► Imagination meets reality
Experience the awe-inspiring details of Norse mythology brought to life with Unreal Engine 5.
Step into a vivid and immersive world where ancient legends come alive.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Pay to progress: raised by 17 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 24 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Need to pay a lot to progress and to keep up with other spenders. Too much monetization.
the game is literally pay to win. a lot of bugs too. your new update the song of growth part where you kill the Valkyrie is full of bugs and like the Valkyrie itself is not affected by your skills additional info the game is always force…
very very pay to win, crypto features are only to enrich developers not for create an economic system between players
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.35.5 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.35.5, updated 2026-10-15.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
legend-of-ymirAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. One independent signal is read — user reviews — and each candidate finding is filed under the source that supports it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.