Free Logo Maker/Logo creator for the small businesses!
Ropstone app studioSome warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 2.0.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.0.0, updated 2026-08-23.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Free Logo Maker/Logo creator for the small businesses!
The Logofly logo maker app is specially created for small and medium-size business owners who love crafty minimalist logo designs. It is very easy to use the premade templates with our powerful logo editor tool that contains 2000+ elements and color combinations for free!
# Free logo templates:
The logo maker contains 500+ premade logo templates that can be easily edited and modified with our logo maker, user can select from a large variety of logo templates and create their own unique logo within minutes. From profesional business logos to creative crafty logo templates we got you covered! All the templates are organized in categories so it is very easy to use and we keep adding more and more templates.
Apart from the pre-made logos, you can create your own very unique logo from scratch with our powerful logo editor tool!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 25 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 16 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "One-time purchase"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:fbac8366de8d76f32f8cd5a5255817ed7f51e952703c951243e4c8a67407de0bThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a randomised reward ("25000+ Elements") and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app sells randomised rewards — crates, chests, packs, pulls — and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in its own text, so what the money buys is unknowable before paying.
Package artefact
sha256:fbac8366de8d76f32f8cd5a5255817ed7f51e952703c951243e4c8a67407de0bThe app's own text says: "Unlock all Features"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:fbac8366de8d76f32f8cd5a5255817ed7f51e952703c951243e4c8a67407de0bThe app's own text says: "Want more ?"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:fbac8366de8d76f32f8cd5a5255817ed7f51e952703c951243e4c8a67407de0bThe app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:fbac8366de8d76f32f8cd5a5255817ed7f51e952703c951243e4c8a67407de0b400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
a great great app im 17 and want to do logo designing course it is a really good beginning for me i can understand basics very well just no giving one more star because some shapes are not available and adds are too much
you know what there shouldn't be so many adds like this is why I don't like it
good app but a lot of ads
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 2.0.0, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 2.0.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 2.0.0, updated 2026-08-23.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
logo-maker-google-com-logofly-logo-makerAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.