“deleting my review in light of recent events on 6/30/26. BRING BACK VALKO AS INTENDED. It is poorly managed, dev team does not care at ALL about what the fanbase wants. Ads are full of false advertising and blatantly lie about the content…”
Independent automated assessment · 3 signal sources · 2,120 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-04.
2.0 ★297,659 ratings
10M+Downloads
12+Age rating
3724 MBApp size
FreeIn-app purchases
About this app
As the brand-new installment of the popular Mr. Love series, Love and Deepspace allows you to step into a sci-fi world where love knows no bounds. With immersive cutscenes, 3D storylines and interactions, love is truly within reach!
[First-Person 3D Story] A real-time rendered 3D first-person perspective story that lets you be fully immersed in important moments with him, feeling his breath and presence up close. It breaks the boundary between reality and virtual worlds, providing an ultimate, lifelike, immersive experience.
[3D Interactions] Real-time 3D rendering ensures lifelike interactions. Experience intimate moments like never before, watch as your actions provoke unique responses, and savor unforgettable dates, sweet voice messages, and more.
[New Home System] Kitchen now open! The Home system just got even richer.…
Preview
Real screenshots from the store listing.
Independent evidence report
Evidence and review signals
This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.
Which version this describes
When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.
App Store
This analysis describes version 6.0.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 6.0.0, updated 2026-07-08.
Google Play
This analysis describes version 6.0.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-04 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 6.0.0, updated 2026-07-06.
What we measured
Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.
Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.
Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
3 or more themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.
In the package we scanned
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence about the app, not a finding about it.
Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured
What the analysis found
App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.
Positive evidence 1
Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.
Developer says data deletion can be requested
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
One source only — shown, not confirmed 3
A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.
Reported by users: Reports that the ads misrepresent the app
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
What we saw: Misleading advertising: raised by 18 distinct reviewers (1.2% of 1454 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Pay to progress
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 11 distinct reviewers (0.8% of 1454 reviews scanned)
Reported by users: Paywall blocks the basics
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
What we saw: Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (0.3% of 1454 reviews scanned)
Highlighted reviews
Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.
“FALSE ADVERTISEMENT. New love interest was announced, and then taken away a day later. The company refuses to acknowledge global players wants. They're silent about the heinous actions of their fanbase. Constantly and poorly censoring…”
“the company that didn't want to communicate with their player base properly. disrespect their player wishes. keep ignoring the thing their player need. many bugs. fake advertisement, expensive stuff for cheap design. repetitive animation.”
Assessment & version history
App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.
Store listing updated to version 6.0.0.
What this app sells
Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.
Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—
Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.