Appworthy

Lucky Clover Quest

Embark on a magical adventure filled with luck and riches!

TaSharE Development
Get it onGoogle Play
Google Play rating3.4★502 ratings
PriceFreeListed price
Age9+Store age rating
CategoryGames
DeveloperTaSharE Development

What we found

Full report

Some warnings 5 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 134 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.

Money

  • Free to download.

Ads

From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 1.0.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 1.0.6, updated 2026-09-10.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Embark on a magical adventure filled with luck and riches! Dive into the enchanting world of Lucky Clover Quest, where every spin brings you closer to legendary wins and endless spinning joy—all guided by the charm of the four-leaf clover! 🍀

🍀 Fortune Clover Theme

Immerse yourself in a vibrant, green-themed realm decorated with lucky clovers and sparkling symbols. Each spin is wrapped in an aura of good fortune and exciting rewards!

🎮 Classic & Engaging Gameplay

Experience the timeless thrill of slot action! Simple to play yet irresistibly fun—watch the reels spin, line up lucky combinations, and collect instant wins.

✨ Exciting Bonus Features

Unlock thrilling bonus rounds and multiplier games for even bigger treasures! Return daily to claim free coins, free spins, and special surprises—your luck builds with every login!…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

1 published · 1 shown, not confirmed

Positives 1

Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.

Developer says data deletion can be requested

Measured

The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the Google Play listing
Definition

The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.

Open evidence

One source only — shown, not confirmed 1

Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.

Aggressive ad load

One source only

Aggressive ad load: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 27 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
Only one kind of source so far. Shown, not counted.
Where measured
From Google Play reviews

This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.

Definition

Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
3.7% of the 134 reviews read.

Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.

What reviewers report

134 reviews read · 1 review-based observation

134 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Aggressive ad load

Shown, not confirmed

ur ads said and showed that if u download the game u could withdrawal ur winnings at any amount and WITHOUT ANY HASSLE...NO ADS ....NOTHING .....SO I HAD TO WAIT UNTIL I HIT 800.00$ TO WITHDRAW SO THE ANY AMOUNT WAS A LIE.....NOW I ALSO…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-11

ANOTHER CASH GAME LIE! NO ADS MY *SS! THERE IS AN AD EVERY 5-6 SECONDS. & IF YOU WANT BIGGER PAY OUT, GUESS WHAT?! U GOT IT!! ANOTHER AD 4 EVERY TIME U TRY 2 ADD 2 UR CASH BALANCE. All these cash games lie. I haven't tried to cash out…

1★ · Google Play · 2026-06-04

so many adds wants you to spin 200 times before cash out free spins don't count you only have so long to complete 200 spins other wise it cancels

1★ · Google Play · 2026-05-31

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description doesn’t list prices (most don’t)
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
1 theme reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
Under 65% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 27 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 1.0.6 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 1.0.6, updated 2026-09-10.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

Google Play

Version 1.0.6 · 2026-09-10

No release notes were provided for this version.

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
lucky-clover-quest
Assessment date
27 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
134
Package examined
No package scan
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-27 from 134 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-27 Version analyzed: 1.0.63 independent signals134 reviews scannedConfidence: HighNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

Google Play

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

Google Play

Store rating
3.35 ★ · 502 ratings
Version
1.0.6
Updated
10 Sep 2026
Price
Free
Age rating
9+
Size
Not supplied
Open in Google Play
Developer
TaSharE Development
Category
Games
Listing price
Free

No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.
Review thresholds Read the methodology For developers

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.

Report a factual error — free Email a correction