Luzia is a capable AI assistant that helps you get real work done.
FACTORIA ELCANO SLSome warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 5.48.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 5.48.0, updated 2026-10-23.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Luzia is a capable AI assistant that helps you get real work done. Writing, studying, coding, translating, creating images, and running your day, all in one app, powered by the best AI models for every task. Free to start, with no account needed.
Do real work
- Draft and polish emails, documents, and essays
- Summarize long PDFs and articles in seconds
- Generate, explain, and debug code
- Work through math and problems step by step
Learn anything
- Clear explanations on any subject, at your level
- Practice and learn new languages
- Translate across hundreds of languages instantly
Create
- Generate original images from a simple description
- Edit and refine your images
- Develop ideas for projects, content, and gifts
Run your day
- Set reminders and keep track of your tasks
- Turn voice messages and audio into text
- Catch up on the weather and the latest news
Talk, your way…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Paywall is server-configured and A/B tested via RevenueCat Paywalls — the offer shown can differ per user
The app ships a remote paywall-experimentation SDK, so the offer shown is configured server-side and may differ per user — including from anything we or a reviewer saw.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:5f842c2253b695c4fe611f5adb3db71df7bb18fd697f07ca045a84b74625fe02Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "One time purchase"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
sha256:5f842c2253b695c4fe611f5adb3db71df7bb18fd697f07ca045a84b74625fe02The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Cancellation copy routes the user away from a direct control: "Before you cancel, please consider accepting this offer"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:5f842c2253b695c4fe611f5adb3db71df7bb18fd697f07ca045a84b74625fe02The app's own text says: "Come back tomorrow or upgrade to Luzia+ for longer, uninterrupted chats."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:5f842c2253b695c4fe611f5adb3db71df7bb18fd697f07ca045a84b74625fe02The app's own text says: "Hello, I'm %1$s. Ask me for advice, answers, or let's talk about whatever you want. What would you like to talk about today?"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:5f842c2253b695c4fe611f5adb3db71df7bb18fd697f07ca045a84b74625fe02The app's own text says: "Download a model to chat offline with Luzia"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:5f842c2253b695c4fe611f5adb3db71df7bb18fd697f07ca045a84b74625fe02No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 5.48.0, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 5.48.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 5.48.0, updated 2026-10-23.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
luziaAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.