Nothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
No specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 12 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 27.0.3 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-12 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 27.0.3, updated 2026-10-07.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Welcome to the new MADFUT app — and a new season of nonstop content, special events, new features, and exciting ways to play.
• Build Drafts, solve DOTD challenges, compete in Draft Cups and earn Weekly Ranks
• Evolutions and Elite EVOs: upgrade regular and unique cards to their special versions
• Complete SBCs and Objectives to earn unique rewards
• Pack Duos LTM makes a return, along with 3 new LTM cards
• Compete in the unique Fatal modes using squads you build from your own cards
• Build your collection and unlock special badges and achievements in the process
More content and new releases are planned this year than ever before, and we can’t wait for you to experience it.
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 10 distinct reviewers (4.6% of 216 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
216 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Almost perfect — This game is nearly perfect the only problem is the never ending ads. It is insane there needs to be 24/7 ads on the bottom of the screen when doing anything. It’s beyond disgusting that you need to have some many ads in…
Ads — To many ads for me I’m not trying to keep waiting like let me play
Great game, terrible ad strategy. — This game is an easy 5 star and one of the best gatcha games on the market if they just allowed you to purchase an “ad free” experience. The constant ads ruin the game.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 27.0.3 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-12 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 27.0.3, updated 2026-10-07.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
• MADFUT 27 IS HERE! • You can continue playing Madfut 26 in the same app. All your progress has been saved. • Pack Duos LTM is back with 3 new ’27 LTM cards • Ability to restart EVOs • Preview final EVO before selecting a player • Show final EVO stats for all players on player selection screen • Filter by EVO completion state • Skip button in Draft Summary • Ability to earn automatic Full Chem through EVOs • Option to open multiple Player Picks in a row • Indicator to show cards that meet requirements for a DOTD or Objectives in Draft picks • Settings to select a minimum rating and “New Only” for showing a walkout animation • Bug fixes
• 2 new LTM cards • Bug fixes
Appworthy
madfut-27Assessed 2026-10-12 from 216 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.