Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code and the store listing.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.6.3 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.6.3, updated 2026-09-22.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Transform lives, one bubble at a time!
Welcome to Makeover Mania - Bubble Shooter, a relaxing puzzle game where colorful bubble popping meets fashion, dress-up, and emotional makeover stories.
Join Mania on her journey to create beautiful transformations. Pop bubbles, beat fun puzzle levels, unlock stylish outfits, and help characters rediscover their confidence through fashion, beauty, and fresh new beginnings.
BUBBLE PUZZLE GAMEPLAY
Aim, shoot, and pop colorful bubbles through fun and challenging levels. Plan your moves, create satisfying combos, and use powerful boosters to clear tricky puzzles.
FASHION, DRESS-UP & MAKEOVER
Unlock outfits, hairstyles, makeup, accessories, and decoration choices as you progress. Clean up messy looks, choose the perfect style, and reveal stunning before-and-after transformations.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 12 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 8 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:2443497226702f01950a226e85beb013c30d6f431836863afac477320b8b9476Aggressive ad load: raised by 29 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 14 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:2443497226702f01950a226e85beb013c30d6f431836863afac477320b8b9476400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
This is a fun game but the endless ads agter every level is monotonous. Sure you can remove them for 6.99 but i think that is unfair. Why cant a company allow the player to enjoy their game without being greedy. Also, when you exit out of…
I was in the Bubble shooting part of the game and my phone cut itself off. My problem now, is the whole game will not load. Yes, I am totally addicted to this game, which is not good. Besides, the game is so much fun with a gripping story…
An ad every 2 levels is ridiculous, especially since there's also permanent banner ads. Aiming can be annoying, sometimes it shifts off course as you fire, making you miss and waste a bubble. The dialog box is too small and constantly…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.6.3, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.6.3 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 1.6.3, updated 2026-09-22.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
makeover-mania-bubble-shooterAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.