Hard to cancel
Reported by 26 usersHard to cancel: raised by 26 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 19 reviews we read)
Definition
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 500 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.16.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.16.4, updated 2024-12-07.








Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Our glow-up affirmations & empowering practices are designed to take your life to the next level, attract unlimited abundance and radiate feminine energy wherever you go.
Just download the app and transform your life like never before!
You can contact our client support: [email protected]
With Manifest, you get:
Content to enjoy:
- A glow-up library with custom 30-day plans to unleash your inner archetype power & create new habits for personal growth
- A variety of affirmation categories to awaken your selfish baddie
- A collection of animated backgrounds to help you release anxiety & keep a positive vibe
- Goddess journaling prompts for your daily self-reflection & empowerment
- Shareable affirmations for confidence & faster attraction of your desires
Features to try:…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Hard to cancel: raised by 26 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 19 reviews we read)
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Surprise charges: raised by 37 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 14 reviews we read)
A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
In-app purchases run from USD 3.99 to USD 89.99 — a 23x spread across 10 items
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
500 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 26 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 19 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).
recurring monthly payment after cancel — if I could I will rate it zero star. I canceled it but monthly payment continues occurring. No way to cancel. My username is not found, and I tried to login through their zendesk.com page, and it’s…
Do not download this app — Very expensive…. very hard to cancel! You have to download another app, that forces you to pay a monthly subscription in order to email them to cancel the original subscription. It’s ridiculous. I don’t care how…
Not worth it. — Do not purchase. Impossible to cancel. No one gets back to you.
Raised by 37 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 14 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).
Won’t cancel my subscription — I went through the appropriate steps to cancel and they still keep charging me!
FRAUD — I will be suing you all for charging my account WITHOUT my permission.
Not able to unsubscribe — The app itself is a good app, however the instructions to unsubscribe are not correct. Where the instructions tell you to go to unsubscribe the unsubscribe button is not there. Then they state to send an email…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.16.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 3.16.4, updated 2024-12-07.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
In this version, we've fixed empty plans and explore tab!
manifest-affirmationsAssessed 2026-10-27 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.