Manifest Affirmations

Self Love & Abundance Plan

Avrora
App Store rating4.5★6.7K ratings
PriceFreeIn-app $3.99–$89.99
Age17+Store age rating
Size403 MBiPhone download
CategoryHealth & Fitness
DeveloperAvrora

What we found

Full report

Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 500 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.

Money

From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.

This analysis describes version 3.16.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 3.16.4, updated 2024-12-07.

Preview

Screenshot 1Screenshot 2Screenshot 3Screenshot 4Screenshot 5Screenshot 6Screenshot 7Screenshot 8

Store screenshots supplied by the developer.

About this app

Our glow-up affirmations & empowering practices are designed to take your life to the next level, attract unlimited abundance and radiate feminine energy wherever you go.

Just download the app and transform your life like never before!

You can contact our client support: [email protected]

With Manifest, you get:

Content to enjoy:

- A glow-up library with custom 30-day plans to unleash your inner archetype power & create new habits for personal growth

- A variety of affirmation categories to awaken your selfish baddie

- A collection of animated backgrounds to help you release anxiety & keep a positive vibe

- Goddess journaling prompts for your daily self-reflection & empowerment

- Shareable affirmations for confidence & faster attraction of your desires

Features to try:…

From the developer’s store description.

For developers and the curious

The full report

The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.

Findings and evidence

3 published · 0 shown, not confirmed

Things to watch for 2

Findings that met the published evidence standard.

Hard to cancel

Reported by 26 users

Hard to cancel: raised by 26 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 19 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
User reports only. Published because the review evidence cleared this label’s own reviewer threshold.
Where measured
From App Store reviews
Reported by
Raised by 26 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 19 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).
Definition

Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
5.2% of the 500 reviews read on this store leg (App Store).
Published threshold
26 reviewers and 2.07% of at least 500 reviews

Reports of unexpected charges

Reported by 37 users

Surprise charges: raised by 37 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 14 reviews we read)

Sources
User reviews
Agreement
User reports only. Published because the review evidence cleared this label’s own reviewer threshold.
Where measured
From App Store reviews
Reported by
Raised by 37 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 14 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).
Definition

A large number of reviewers report being charged when they did not expect it — including being charged after cancelling during a free trial, or when a trial turned into a paid plan without warning. We cannot see anyone's billing, so this is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.

Open evidence
How we know
Share and sample
7.4% of the 500 reviews read on this store leg (App Store).
Published threshold
31 reviewers and 2.47% of at least 500 reviews

Context 1

Facts that add context without being a charge.

Cheapest and priciest options are far apart

Measured

In-app purchases run from USD 3.99 to USD 89.99 — a 23x spread across 10 items

Sources
The store listing
Agreement
A measured fact from one deterministic, checkable source.
Where measured
From the App Store listing
Definition

The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.

Open evidence

What reviewers report

500 reviews read · 2 review-based observations

500 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.

Hard to cancel

Published finding

Raised by 26 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 19 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).

recurring monthly payment after cancel — if I could I will rate it zero star. I canceled it but monthly payment continues occurring. No way to cancel. My username is not found, and I tried to login through their zendesk.com page, and it’s…

1★ · App Store · 2025-03-23

Do not download this app — Very expensive…. very hard to cancel! You have to download another app, that forces you to pay a monthly subscription in order to email them to cancel the original subscription. It’s ridiculous. I don’t care how…

1★ · App Store · 2024-11-27

Not worth it. — Do not purchase. Impossible to cancel. No one gets back to you.

1★ · App Store · 2024-11-03

Reports of unexpected charges

Published finding

Raised by 37 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 14 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).

Won’t cancel my subscription — I went through the appropriate steps to cancel and they still keep charging me!

1★ · App Store · 2025-04-07

FRAUD — I will be suing you all for charging my account WITHOUT my permission.

1★ · App Store · 2025-01-29

Not able to unsubscribe — The app itself is a good app, however the instructions to unsubscribe are not correct. Where the instructions tell you to go to unsubscribe the unsubscribe button is not there. Then they state to send an email…

1★ · App Store · 2024-12-17

A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.

Measurements

5 measured · 3 not assessed

“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.

From store data and reviews

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to fewer than 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
The store description lists a price and how often it bills
Cancelling, in the store description
The store description doesn’t say how to cancel (most don’t)
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the app package we scanned

No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.

Sensitive permissions
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
Not assessed
No package has been scanned for this app
How we know

Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured

Versions and dates analysed

Assessed 27 Oct 2026

This analysis describes version 3.16.4 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .

The store currently lists version 3.16.4, updated 2024-12-07.

Store update history

Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.

App Store

Version 3.16.4 · 2024-12-07
In this version, we've fixed empty plans and explore tab!

Assessment record

Status
Automated analysis
App identifier
manifest-affirmations
Assessment date
27 Oct 2026
Sources used
3 independent signals: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure
Reviews read
500
Package examined
No package scan
Human inspection
Not completed

Assessed 2026-10-27 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.

How we know
Measurement vocabulary
1.4

How this page was produced

Analyzed 2026-10-27 Version analyzed: 3.16.43 independent signals500 reviews scannedConfidence: LowNot human-reviewedVocabulary v1.13Methodology v1.3
Signals run: user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure. Not yet checked: SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest.

Store facts

App Store

What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.

App Store

Store rating
4.53 ★ · 6,691 ratings
Version
3.16.4
Updated
7 Dec 2024
Price
Free · In-app purchases
Age rating
17+
Size
403 MB
Open in App Store
Developer
Avrora
Category
Health & Fitness
Listing price
Free · In-app purchases

Purchases the store lists

 What this app sells

From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.

Subscriptions8
Weekly offerWeekly$4.99
Weekly offerWeekly$5.99
Weekly specialWeekly$3.99
Manifest Affirmations - WeeklyWeekly$6.99
Manifest: MonthlyMonthly$14.99
Manifest: YearlyYearly$29.99
Manifest: YearlyYearly$89.99
Yearly PlanYearly$19.99
Buy once2
Lifetime offerLifetime$29.99
Manifest Affirmations LifetimeLifetime$49.99
This list is cut off. Apple shows at most 10 in-app purchases, and this app is at the limit — so it very likely sells more than we can see.

Method and limits

What this report can and cannot show

How the automated analysis works

This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.

No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.

There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.

Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.

Limits of this report

  • A package scan is static. It identifies code and text in one Android build. It does not measure a live ad session, test a deletion request, or count the steps needed to cancel.
  • Reviews keep their sample. A review-only charge shows distinct reviewers, the share and the sample size, and is published only once it clears that label’s published threshold. Calibration labels are machine-drafted and not yet confirmed by a person.
  • Not assessed is a state. It is never a zero and never a pass.
  • A missing label is not a clean bill of health. It means the evidence did not support one, not that the app is problem-free.
Not yet human-reviewed. A hands-on test can confirm or contradict a finding and adds its own measurements; it does not change a measurement row. Hands-on inspections are not yet open.

Request a correction

[email protected]

Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.