Masjidak is an integrated digital application that makes it easier to access…
Awqaf-itToo little checked to say Only 68 reviews read, too few to say.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 5.2.3 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 5.2.3, updated 2026-09-14.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Masjidak is an integrated digital application that makes it easier to access mosques, services, and religious activities through a modern and clear user experience. The app aims to connect users with mosques in a closer and more effective way through a unified platform that allows them to explore mosque information, locations, activities, announcements, and related services.
Through Masjidak, users can:
• Browse and search for mosques easily
• Reach mosque locations through the map
• Follow religious lessons, activities, and events
• View important announcements and notifications
• Check prayer times with the ability to copy and share them
Key Features:
• Comprehensive Mosque Directory: Access mosque information and locations through a clear and organized interface
• Activities and Events Tracking: Stay updated with lectures, lessons, and religious or community…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 1 SDK detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:c0fff29c10f939a026901edddd2dcadb2bbfcc89c5914b1e174b8ec482b85489Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 5.2.3, scanned 25 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 5.2.3 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 5.2.3, updated 2026-09-14.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
masjidakAssessed 2026-10-25 from 68 user reviews, the app's package and the store listing.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Five independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest and the store listing — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.