Some warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 479 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 260817.66 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 260817.66, updated 2026-08-18.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
A medieval tower defense and strategy game where you build a castle, train an army, and defend your realm. Expand your kingdom, conquer lands, and unleash powerful special attacks!
Your medieval journey begins.
As a medieval knight, you set sail to a distant island. Your mission is to build a crusader stronghold, defend it against endless enemies, and expand your realm into a mighty empire.
Build your medieval economy, train fearless warriors, and fortify your castle with archers and catapults. Survive relentless enemy waves, unlock new unit types, and research powerful upgrades to secure your kingdom’s future.
When your army is ready, march beyond your walls.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:8be37d2c8656bc9ee04ea7b80fd8aa8d622785c5aac3cd9287e058a44e1f04dbSpecific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a subscription in-app but ships no cancel or manage-subscription text of its own, leaving the store's settings as the only exit
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:8be37d2c8656bc9ee04ea7b80fd8aa8d622785c5aac3cd9287e058a44e1f04dbPay to progress: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 80 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
479 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
No sampled quote is attached to this observation.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 260817.66, scanned 22 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 260817.66 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 260817.66, updated 2026-08-18.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
- New minigames: Five in a Row (Gomoku) and Chess - A dragon?! - Visual improvements and performance optimizations
No release notes were provided for this version.
medieval-defense-and-conquest-2Assessed 2026-10-30 from 479 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.