Mindfulness, Breathe, Sounds
YEDI70 YAZILIM VE BILGI TEKNOLOJILERI ANONIM SIRKETISome warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 812 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 5.3.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 5.3.1, updated 2026-10-24.
This analysis describes version 5.2.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 5.2.2, updated 2026-10-02.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
With hundreds of mindfulness meditation apps to pick from, what makes Meditopia so special? Well, unlike most of the other options, Meditopia offers more than just a short-term solution to falling asleep, finding balance and de-stressing; we offer each member over 1000 deep-dive meditations and breathing exercises that get right to the heart of what we as a people, regardless of age, background, or experience, are dealing with everyday.
These meditations, offered in 12 languages, aim to cover the entire spectrum of human experiences from relationships, expectations, acceptance, and loneliness, to our body-image, sexuality, life purpose, and feelings of inadequacy. Meditopia doesn’t just want to be a band-aid for wounds which we know require permanent healing.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 69 reviews we read)
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
In-app purchases run from USD 2.99 to USD 99.99 — a 33x spread across 10 items
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 9 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:7efc9f4667d8d3ab3a31406fe56a1a6409e51456c6ab954631df37507f1d391fThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Are you deleting your account because of an issue? Please consider sending us an email via [email protected] or checking our FAQ page before deleting your account."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:7efc9f4667d8d3ab3a31406fe56a1a6409e51456c6ab954631df37507f1d391fThe app's own text says: "Get notified when you earn points: Your actions in Meditopia now turn into points. If you activate this feature, you’ll receive a message every time you earn points."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:7efc9f4667d8d3ab3a31406fe56a1a6409e51456c6ab954631df37507f1d391fOffers a free trial ("Decline the free trial?") with no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:7efc9f4667d8d3ab3a31406fe56a1a6409e51456c6ab954631df37507f1d391fThe app's own text says: "Go to your Profile and tap on Settings."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:7efc9f4667d8d3ab3a31406fe56a1a6409e51456c6ab954631df37507f1d391fThe app's own text says: "Go offline mode"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:7efc9f4667d8d3ab3a31406fe56a1a6409e51456c6ab954631df37507f1d391f812 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Basically everything is behind paywall. Taking advantage like this of suffering people who search for help is bad. What a waste of time.
why… — i used to use this app so much and i really liked it until you guys started making us have to pay. all the sleep sounds used to be free now out of all of them, only one is free…you can barely do anything with the free version of…
I don’t like it — Everything I want to play is locked and I’m tired of wasting my time finding all this locked content when I just want to meditate
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 5.2.2, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 5.3.1 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 5.3.1, updated 2026-10-24.
This analysis describes version 5.2.2 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 5.2.2, updated 2026-10-02.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Meditopia is ready for iPhone Duo! With fresh new screen designs, your Meditopia experience just got an upgrade. Explore a whole new way to enjoy Meditopia and keep your well-being journey going!
Meditopia is ready for iPhone Duo! With fresh new screen designs, your Meditopia experience just got an upgrade. Explore a whole new way to enjoy Meditopia and keep your well-being journey going!
No release notes were provided for this version.
meditopiaAssessed 2026-10-27 from 812 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.