Nothing published. That is not a guarantee the app is problem-free.
No specific positive published.
From our automated analysis, 13 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.97 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-13 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.97, updated 2026-09-01.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Looking for a space where you can be yourself and meet people who truly click with you? Welcome to Meete, the vibrant social community designed for authentic interactions and meaningful discoveries. Whether you want to expand your social circle, find someone with shared passions, or just have a friendly chat, Meete is your safe harbor in the social world.
Why Choose Meete?
* Verified Profiles, Real People
Tired of bots and fake accounts? So are we. Meete emphasizes authenticity. Our rigorous verification process helps ensure that the people you see are real, making your social experience more trustworthy and enjoyable.
* Safety & Respect First
We believe a great community is built on respect. Meete provides a secure environment where your privacy and safety are our top priorities. We use advanced technology and human oversight to keep our community positive and welcoming.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
In-app purchases run from USD 2.99 to USD 99.99 — a 33x spread across 10 items
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Misleading advertising: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (1.2% of 504 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
504 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Horrible app, just another cash grab — All profiles are pretty much of fake women and even if there was one outta the hundreds of bots you wouldn’t see her, and also it’s not free to text that same woman nooo the ads lied to you lol… you…
False advertising — App is a bust. Souls concept and easy to use. A lot of potential, but it legit has not geofencing for preference. You have to spend money to talk to others, which is kinda fine until you find out they live in another…
False advertising — So I’m about 90% sure that the app actually has no idea what “local” actually is as everyone I matched with was not even in the same state and most not in the same country and I guess real is subjective because I…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.97 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-13 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.97, updated 2026-09-01.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Bug fixes and user experience improvements
Appworthy
meete-apple-1510917465Assessed 2026-10-13 from 504 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.