Some warnings 6 users report the basics being behind a paywall. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 432 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 6.0.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 6.0.0, updated 2026-09-22.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
YOUR BODY JOURNEY. ALL IN ONE PLACE.
MeThreeSixty brings your body progress together in one app. Scan your body in 3D, track measurements and body composition, follow your weight and goals, and keep your GLP-1 dose history alongside the changes happening to your body.
With a redesigned Home, the tools and information that matter to your journey are easier to access, track, and understand.
POWERFUL 3D BODY SCANNING
Turn your phone's camera into a powerful 3D body scanner. Two quick poses, front and side, are all it takes.
MeThreeSixty creates your personal 3D body avatar, captures 14+ body measurements, and helps you see how your body is changing over time. No tape measure. No expensive equipment. No guesswork. Always free.
MORE THAN A WEIGHT TRACKER
The scale only tells part of the story.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
In-app purchases run from USD 1.99 to USD 39.99 — a 20x spread across 7 items
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 72 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
432 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
“Premium” — I just re-downloaded this app and find that I now have to pay for a “premium” plan just to view my past scans? That’s ridiculous!
What happened? — I have been using this app for 2 years no issues had all may scans. Went to update my scans and had to reinstall the app and now have no ability to log in to my original account. All my history is gone. Looks like most of…
It’s Changed — I used to love this app! It was great to keep track of my weight without just using a scale. However, when I logged into the account I’ve had since April 2023, it now wants me to pay to see my old scans. So I can no longer…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 6.0.0 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 6.0.0, updated 2026-09-22.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Meet the new MeThreeSixty . Introducing a completely redesigned Home that makes it easier to track your whole health journey. Also new: • GLP-1 dose tracking • Improved goal setting and tracking • FutureMe Moment Plus, everything you already use MeThreeSixty for - including 3Dbody scans, measurements, body composition, weight tracking, and more.
Appworthy
methreesixtyAssessed 2026-10-27 from 432 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.