Connect instantly, talk freely on any topic, and personalize your social expe…
Black King BarSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 65 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.2.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.2.0, updated 2026-10-23.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Connect instantly, talk freely on any topic, and personalize your social experience with Metopia – the easiest way to meet people through live video chat.
Feeling bored or looking to expand your social circle? Metopia is your premier destination for anonymous chat and live video chat with real people worldwide. Whether you want to join random chat rooms, have face-to-face random video chat, or enjoy voice chat with strangers, our app connects you with real people in seconds.
Key Features:
- Random Video Chat: Connect instantly with people across the globe for high-quality live video chat conversations. Experience the thrill of cam random matching with just one tap.
- Join Random Chat Rooms: Explore diverse communities and talk freely on any topic that interests you. From chit chat to deep conversations, every chat room has something new.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 8 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Google Mobile Ads (AdMob / Ad Manager), Meta Audience Network and 4 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:e2b5210718b7ef545ca2b82cb374478d8cd69f11d5b335072fdde8a315dee944Aggressive ad load: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 13 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "One time purchase"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
sha256:e2b5210718b7ef545ca2b82cb374478d8cd69f11d5b335072fdde8a315dee944The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "Open ad when you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:e2b5210718b7ef545ca2b82cb374478d8cd69f11d5b335072fdde8a315dee944The app's own text says: "Unlock All Features"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:e2b5210718b7ef545ca2b82cb374478d8cd69f11d5b335072fdde8a315dee944Offers a trial ("Start subscription") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:e2b5210718b7ef545ca2b82cb374478d8cd69f11d5b335072fdde8a315dee944The app's own text says: "Continue as %1$s"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:e2b5210718b7ef545ca2b82cb374478d8cd69f11d5b335072fdde8a315dee94465 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Trying to do too many things, and too many ads.
I installed the app, but I haven’t actually been able to try it yet because it’s ad after ad. I still don’t even know what the program itself looks like. I can’t spend 10 minutes sitting through endless ads just to find out if they ever…
too much adds
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.2.0, scanned 27 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.2.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.2.0, updated 2026-10-23.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
metopia-random-video-chat-liveAssessed 2026-10-27 from 65 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.