Miracast: Smart Cast & Remote — Your complete solution for screen mirroring,…
FlowmaticSerious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 5.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 5.0, updated 2026-10-06.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Miracast: Smart Cast & Remote — Your complete solution for screen mirroring, casting to TV, and watching live IPTV channels — all in one app.
📡 Screen Mirroring & Casting
Mirror your entire Android screen or cast specific content wirelessly to any smart TV with low latency and smooth performance.
✅ Fast screen mirroring with high quality
✅ Compatible with LG, Samsung, Sony, Roku, Chromecast and more
✅ Supports AllShare Cast, Smart View, Any Cast
✅ Stream photos, videos, and presentations without lag
✅ Stable wireless connection — no cables needed
📺 IPTV Smart Player
Watch live TV channels directly on your big screen. Add your M3U or M3U8 playlist and enjoy hundreds of channels smoothly.
✅ Supports M3U and M3U8 playlists
✅ Compatible with Xtream Codes URLs
✅ Smooth live streaming (HLS & MPEG-TS)
✅ Browse channels by category
✅ Fast channel switching…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:90e7e7420a1c1e4b2060631d7ad1cc8e96abcbbf7f0a57210da8eba1049ca46cAggressive ad load: raised by 34 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 12 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
The app's own text says: "How to cancel your subscription?"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Cancelling the subscription is blocked, hidden, multi-step, or simply does not take effect.
Package artefact
sha256:90e7e7420a1c1e4b2060631d7ad1cc8e96abcbbf7f0a57210da8eba1049ca46cThe app's own text says: "Unlock All Features"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:90e7e7420a1c1e4b2060631d7ad1cc8e96abcbbf7f0a57210da8eba1049ca46cThe app's own text says: "Continue with Limited Version"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:90e7e7420a1c1e4b2060631d7ad1cc8e96abcbbf7f0a57210da8eba1049ca46cThe app's own text says: "Downloads"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:90e7e7420a1c1e4b2060631d7ad1cc8e96abcbbf7f0a57210da8eba1049ca46c400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
this app sucks. you just get ad after ad after ad and then never lets you past the home screen to connect and actually use it for streaming- just endless ads every button you attempt to click. It's completely pointless. I wish I could…
Too many ads man. damn. edit: why not just charge like 5 bucks or something for the app. This is unreasonable. Seriously. Like ludicrously unreasonable. No one is trying to play some stupid spam game to cast to the tv 🤣.
I didn't even get to to anything was bombarded with ads for 5mins. Ads that open the browser itself
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 5.0, scanned 29 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 5.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 5.0, updated 2026-10-06.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
miracast-google-co-vulcanlabs-miracastandroidAssessed 2026-10-30 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.