Serious warnings 3 confirmed warnings. Checked: 400 reviews and the Android app’s code.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.6.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 1.6.1, updated 2026-09-22.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Stop depending on streaming. Music Player Offline MP3 & EQ puts your entire music library in your hands, no Wi-Fi, no mobile data, no interruptions.
Whether you're commuting, traveling, working out, or relaxing at home, this offline music player lets you play your favorite songs anytime, anywhere. Enjoy a powerful music player designed for local files with crystal-clear HD audio, advanced equalizer (EQ) controls, Bass Booster, and a smart music library.
🎵 Smart Music Library & Playlists
Keep every song perfectly organized with a powerful music library.
• Browse your music by artist, album, folder, genre or playlist
• Quickly find any song with smart search and filters
• Create, edit and organize unlimited playlists
• Manage your complete offline music collection with ease
• Scroll through large libraries instantly…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:7fcb019f49c3d935d06a1251d55ea72dbde9f00bc3d7df5b49785899abe5eb6aPaywall is server-configured and A/B tested via Adapty — the offer shown can differ per user
The app ships a remote paywall-experimentation SDK, so the offer shown is configured server-side and may differ per user — including from anything we or a reviewer saw.
Package artefact
sha256:7fcb019f49c3d935d06a1251d55ea72dbde9f00bc3d7df5b49785899abe5eb6aAggressive ad load: raised by 28 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 14 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Ships 5 distinct tracking/analytics SDKs: Amplitude, AppMetrica, Datadog RUM, Firebase Analytics and 1 more
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app ships session-recording or a wide tracking stack, holds permissions that read personal data, or is reported by users to sell, leak or over-collect it. The evidence line says which of those was observed.
Package artefact
sha256:7fcb019f49c3d935d06a1251d55ea72dbde9f00bc3d7df5b49785899abe5eb6aSells a randomised reward ("Not Really") and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app sells randomised rewards — crates, chests, packs, pulls — and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in its own text, so what the money buys is unknowable before paying.
Package artefact
sha256:7fcb019f49c3d935d06a1251d55ea72dbde9f00bc3d7df5b49785899abe5eb6aOffers a trial ("Life Time Plan") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:7fcb019f49c3d935d06a1251d55ea72dbde9f00bc3d7df5b49785899abe5eb6aThe app's own text says: "Please press "Continue" if you choose to start using our app."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:7fcb019f49c3d935d06a1251d55ea72dbde9f00bc3d7df5b49785899abe5eb6aThe app's own text says: "Downloads paused"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:7fcb019f49c3d935d06a1251d55ea72dbde9f00bc3d7df5b49785899abe5eb6a400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
This is a very useless application, so many ads come in it... listen to songs or watch advertisements
Terrible unskippable ads spam machine, do not download this.
works for a minute then the ads start. they're long and constant. Once you close the app and reopen it, you get nothing but ads. I don't mean one or two, but it plays nothing but ads and the music screen never pops up
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 1.6.1, scanned 25 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.6.1 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 1.6.1, updated 2026-09-22.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
music-player-google-musicplayer-hdvideoplayer-backgroundmusicAssessed 2026-10-25 from 400 user reviews and the app's package.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Four independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text and the app manifest — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.