Saddle up for fun, friendship and adventure with all of the most popular poni…
Gameloft SESome warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 2 more things. Checked: 532 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 20 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 11.4.3c of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-20 .
The store currently lists version 11.4.3c, updated 2026-10-08.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Saddle up for fun, friendship and adventure with all of the most popular ponies in Equestria in the free official game based on the phenomenal MLP TV show.
Only Twilight Sparkle -- the student of Princess Celestia -- and her friends Rainbow Dash, Fluttershy and the rest can save the day for every horse in the city as they farm resources, meet cute friends and reach for their dreams.
· Over 2000 characters: Meet a royal prince or princess one day, a cute adventure-seeking horse the next day and who knows what the next. Give them places to stay, nibble on hay and hear what they have to say.
Explore the Crystal Empire, Canterlot, Sweet Apple Acres farm and more.
· Make a pretty pony home: Beautify your MLP town and make it better than in any other city builders out there with cute houses, adorable decorations and enough magic for everypony that gallops by.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:f67cf0da6962a4bd491be969f81eaf27f7ad2046d5c1fac1bed17cbabb38dedaSpecific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "Buy subscription but the product is one-time purchase"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
sha256:f67cf0da6962a4bd491be969f81eaf27f7ad2046d5c1fac1bed17cbabb38dedaThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 89 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Pay to progress: raised by 16 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 33 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
532 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Insane # of ads if you are free to play. I began paying 5$ a month for membership and my experience has been more enjoyable, simply because I am not being bombarded with ads every 30 seconds. gems have gotten easier to earn aswell, making…
as much as i love the game itself, it's hard to ignore the constant ads and pay-to-win aspects of the game. everything costs tons of gems, which you have to grind for unless you have cash to spare, and random things like doing balloon pop…
This game is very pay to win heavy, and you can't save your progress, which I heavily dislike as I have downloaded and deleted this game many times throughout my life. My tablet basically broke and I have a lot of progress on there and…
Game sucks Gameloft is incredibly greedy and heavily punishes free-to-play players with artificial paywalls. In the maze events an other events they deliberately set boss power levels just out of reach to force you to spend gems. To make…
love it, but how come a random pony, who doesnt have any tasks, was barely mentioned/wasnt even in the show and is an alternate of another pony, more expensive than the literal princess of the sun and ruler of equestria??? not to mention…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 11.4.3c, scanned 20 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 11.4.3c of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-20 .
The store currently lists version 11.4.3c, updated 2026-10-08.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
my-little-pony-google-com-gameloft-android-anmp-gloftpohmAssessed 2026-10-20 from 532 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.