Some warnings 13 users report the basics being behind a paywall. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 500 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.17.11 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.17.11, updated 2026-03-28.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
• Track your Period & Cycle
• 12 months Smart predictions for Period, Ovulation & Fertility window
• Log 80+ Symptoms, Moods, Tags
• Reminders before the next period, fertility window & ovulation
• 200+ Cycle Insights that can explain your cycle, help identify regularities & irregularities. Find out more about your body, cycle, ovulation & fertility. Get health tips based on your data.
• Low or High chance to get pregnant statuses
• Reminders to take a pill
• All features are based on scientific studies of building healthy habits
Want to know when your next Period is coming? Confused by symptoms? Want to take your birth control pills on time? Pinkllama is the easiest & funniest way to track your menstrual cycle.
Pinkllama period tracker is a simple and fun app, that will help you to track your period, predict your ovulation, learn about your symptoms, moods, and more!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
In-app purchases run from USD 4.99 to USD 99.99 — a 20x spread across 10 items
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Reviewers describe the free version as usable: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 83 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly say the free version is worth using on its own. Nothing we can measure corroborates that — a free listing with in-app purchases looks identical whether the free tier is generous or a demo — so this is published as what reviewers say, not as a measured credit.
The store privacy disclosure (3 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Paywall blocks the basics: raised by 13 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 38 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
500 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Pretty good — Pretty nice, wish I didn’t have to pay for other trackers such as discharge, mood swings, and physical symptoms but the basic is pretty good.
Love it, but — I love the app, I used it for my first period, but I hate the fact that you have to pay for a lot of things. If you didn’t have to pay for the insights and stuff, I would love the app a lot more, but it’s just okay.
Pink llama all the way! 🦙🎀👀🚴🏻♀️ — I technically don’t get my period yet, ( I’m twelve by the way) but I thought it would be cool to see what the app is like for when I really need it. Is this wrong? Anyway, the app is great and…
Bad — I’m a teen why do I have to pay for everything I js want good free help😭😭
Love this but.. — Love it so much I wish you didn’t have to pay for almost everything I get it you guys can get money to help make the app bigger and better I just wish more stuff was free
Bait-and-switch — This app was great until the latest update. The update claimed to add "new options," but all it actually did was take basic features we’ve always had access to like tracking flow and daily mood and put them behind a…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.17.11 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.17.11, updated 2026-03-28.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Bug fixes. Stay healthy & happy!
Appworthy
my-period-calendar-pinkllamaAssessed 2026-10-27 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.