Row Counter with PDF Import
AnnapurnApp Technologies UG haftungsbeschranktSome warnings 1 confirmed warning. Checked: 502 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 4.17 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store lists the version as varying by device, updated 2026-10-22.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
A Row Counter App optimized for knitting and crocheting:
___ IMPORT YOUR PATTERN ___
# Download your patterns directly into the app, be it a webpage or a pdf, from the web or from your phone, Dropbox or Google Drive
# Create knitting and crochet charts that you can then use as pattern in your project
# Direct access to Ravelry, so you can search their website or access your library.
__ CUSTOMIZE YOUR ROW COUNTER ___
# Set up several counters to keep track of your increases, design, or change of color
# Add reminders to appear on a specific row: you will knit mistake-free!
# You just need a basic counter? No worries, you can also use it without any configuration
___ VOICE CONTROL ___
# No need to touch the app while knitting, just speak to it to increment the counter, and keep your hands free to do beautiful things!…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:6ce3354a2aaf42079fb0ba000b70107696b23fc9d3db1f15a4a7f08201a91b95Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
Offers a one-time or lifetime purchase: "One time purchase, no premium features"
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Package artefact
sha256:6ce3354a2aaf42079fb0ba000b70107696b23fc9d3db1f15a4a7f08201a91b95The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Purchase screen steers the choice: "BEST VALUE"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:6ce3354a2aaf42079fb0ba000b70107696b23fc9d3db1f15a4a7f08201a91b95Deadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Limited Offer"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
Package artefact
sha256:6ce3354a2aaf42079fb0ba000b70107696b23fc9d3db1f15a4a7f08201a91b95Reviewers describe the free version as usable: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 100 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly say the free version is worth using on its own. Nothing we can measure corroborates that — a free listing with in-app purchases looks identical whether the free tier is generous or a demo — so this is published as what reviewers say, not as a measured credit.
The app's own text says: "Premium access required"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:6ce3354a2aaf42079fb0ba000b70107696b23fc9d3db1f15a4a7f08201a91b95The app's own text says: "Sign in to use this app"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:6ce3354a2aaf42079fb0ba000b70107696b23fc9d3db1f15a4a7f08201a91b95The app's own text says: "Thanks for your interest. We will share more once you're back online."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:6ce3354a2aaf42079fb0ba000b70107696b23fc9d3db1f15a4a7f08201a91b95502 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
I absolutely love this app. You can have as many projects as you want and switch between them. I use it for crochet and knit but there are a few other options as well. You can upload your pattern or just use it without a pattern plus…
Such a great app! The free version is good, the paid version is worth every penny. Easy to use and support is always responsive when needed.
An absolute necessity! I've absolutely fallen in love with this app! It is 100% worth the small fee for the upgraded version. The free version is really good too, but for the small fee there are so many useful benefits it's well worth the…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 4.17, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 4.17 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store lists the version as varying by device, updated 2026-10-22.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
- Highlighter handles c2c charts - Improved performance - improved watch - fixed bug drawings, annotations when pdf was rotated - You can now draw on PDFs - Can now order and filter projects - Can now import Word files - Watch connectivity improved - Improved annotations on PDF - Small fixes
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
my-row-counter-knit-and-crochetAssessed 2026-10-30 from 502 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
These are really on sale; we just can’t tell from the name whether they recur.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.