Naukrigulf helps professionals find jobs across Dubai, UAE, Saudi Arabia,…
infoedge.comSome warnings 1 thing we found but could not confirm. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 26 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 5.3.45 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 5.3.45, updated 2026-10-22.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Naukrigulf helps professionals find jobs across Dubai, UAE, Saudi
Arabia, Qatar, Bahrain, Oman and Kuwait— anytime, anywhere.
Designed for job seekers across the Gulf region, Naukrigulf is the number 1 job
site for professionals trusted by 10,000+ employers and featuring 65,000+ active
job vacancies across industries and experience levels — all in one easy-to-use
app.
Why Use the Naukrigulf Job Search App?
Naukrigulf connects millions of job seekers with top employers hiring across the
Gulf region.
• One of the top-rated Gulf job search apps
• Free, fast, and easy to use
• Access to 65,000+ verified job vacancies
• Trusted by 5M+ Android users
• Jobs from 10,000+ employers across industries
• Stay informed with the latest career news, job market updates, and expert
career tips
Key Features of Naukrigulf (Job Search & Career)
App
1.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 6 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:51d6526f5b60382a4293bf69fbc973531f34452fd3b899315bd097586c8bd12bThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Offers a trial ("Make your profile Featured in Naukrigulf database and increase your profile views") and states no renewal price, renewal date or auto-renew notice anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a free trial without stating, beside it, what happens when the trial ends. Read this as context rather than as a charge: renewal terms are normally shown on the store's purchase sheet instead, which we cannot see, and we can only observe one kind of evidence for this — so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:51d6526f5b60382a4293bf69fbc973531f34452fd3b899315bd097586c8bd12bThe app's own text says: "Apply without registration"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:51d6526f5b60382a4293bf69fbc973531f34452fd3b899315bd097586c8bd12bThe app's own text says: "Be the first to know about the latest product improvements & updates."
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:51d6526f5b60382a4293bf69fbc973531f34452fd3b899315bd097586c8bd12bNothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
No review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 5.3.45, scanned 26 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 5.3.45 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-26 .
The store currently lists version 5.3.45, updated 2026-10-22.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
naukrigulfAssessed 2026-10-26 from 400 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.