Dungeon Master Story Adventure
AI Apps Software Services and Advertising ActivitiesSome warnings 20 users report having to wait or pay to keep going. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 163 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.2.7 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.2.7, updated 2026-10-21.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Neverend is an AI-powered DnD-style roleplay game where every adventure is uniquely generated, every choice changes the story, and your AI Game Master keeps the action flowing. Play solo or with friends, anywhere, anytime.
PLAY SOLO OR WITH FRIENDS
Embark on an AI adventure alone, or invite friends to your table. Make decisions together, react to each other's actions, and build a shared tale. The only AI roleplay game with true multiplayer for Dungeons and Dragons-style adventures.
INFINITE AI STORIES
Every adventure is uniquely generated by AI. The world responds to your choices in real time. The AI Game Master never repeats - no two playthroughs are ever the same.
CHOOSE YOUR HERO
Pick a cunning rogue, battle-hardened warrior, mystical sorcerer, or many more.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Facts that add context without being a charge.
In-app purchases run from USD 4.99 to USD 149.99 — a 30x spread across 10 items
The disclosed in-app purchases span an unusually wide price range. Published as context: the cheapest and priciest items may be different kinds of product entirely, so the spread alone deducts nothing.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Energy / timer gating: raised by 20 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 8 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Use is rationed by an energy/hearts/lives meter that runs out and forces a wait or a purchase.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
163 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
It’s OK — It would be better if you could use coins to make inti energy even if they would make it half it would be to buy the coins because you need energy ti buy the coins also the available energy is kinda low
Could be way cooler — Awesome game…but once you run out of energy you have to pay for more. Energy doesn’t build back up over time. Would cost less to play at a game store with other people. Would rather you implement ads to gain energy
Energy — Game is good I only wish that the energy refills over time
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.2.7 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.2.7, updated 2026-10-21.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
- Dice rolls take the spotlight: a 3D d20 tumbles across the screen and lands on your roll, with sound and haptics. - Read Aloud is more reliable: no more crashes when you lock your phone or switch apps, voices download only once, and pronunciation is better. - Long stories save faster and hold up better on weak connections. - Continue now always opens your latest turn. - Bug fixes and improvements.
Appworthy
neverendAssessed 2026-10-27 from 163 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.