The era of expensive roaming and rigid telecom contracts is over.
Smarteletec S.L.Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 689 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 20 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 18.73 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-20 .
The store currently lists version 18.73, updated 2026-10-05.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
The era of expensive roaming and rigid telecom contracts is over. Numero provides you with telecom services, combining instant international virtual SIM data, virtual numbers, and affordable international calls into a single, powerful eSIM service.
Stop sacrificing privacy or overpaying for connectivity. Whether you're a frequent traveler, a small business owner, or simply need a secure second line, Numero gives you the freedom and flexibility you deserve.
Why Numero?
📱Virtual 2nd numbers
Need another mobile number or landline for work, travel, business, WhatsApp Business, marketplace chats, freelance, toll free, or privacy? Numero eSIM lets you add second or multiple numbers without switching or removing your SIM.
Choose numbers from many countries, including a USA phone number. A virtual SIM works through the cloud anywhere in the world.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
The store privacy disclosure (1 entry) names no tracking or advertising use, but the package ships 20 advertising/tracking SDKs: Adjust, Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, AppMetrica
Tracking or advertising SDKs are present in the package that the store's own privacy disclosure does not account for.
Bundles 14 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, Appodeal, BidMachine and 10 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:115f37184f2da64fc790d9a9e1e21639e867c716e3d1a063daf45d57e5726e3bOpen observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch a video to earn a reward!"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Package artefact
sha256:115f37184f2da64fc790d9a9e1e21639e867c716e3d1a063daf45d57e5726e3bPurchase screen steers the choice: "Best Deal"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The purchase screen arrives with one plan already framed as the recommended or most popular choice, so the default is the app's preference rather than the user's. We do not compare the plans' prices, and only the app's own text evidences this, so it is shown, but never counted as a charge.
Package artefact
sha256:115f37184f2da64fc790d9a9e1e21639e867c716e3d1a063daf45d57e5726e3bDeadline pressure in the app's own copy: "Limited Offer"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own purchase copy attaches a deadline to buying — a countdown, 'offer ends in', 'limited time' — or ships a countdown view on a purchase-screen layout.
Package artefact
sha256:115f37184f2da64fc790d9a9e1e21639e867c716e3d1a063daf45d57e5726e3bProgress itself is for sale: "get more Coins!"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
Package artefact
sha256:115f37184f2da64fc790d9a9e1e21639e867c716e3d1a063daf45d57e5726e3bNo review-based observation is published in this assessment. That does not establish that reviewers had no problems.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 18.73, scanned 20 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 18.73 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-20 .
The store currently lists version 18.73, updated 2026-10-05.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
numeroAssessed 2026-10-20 from 689 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.