Some warnings 48 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 400 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 0.3.469 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 0.3.469, updated 2026-09-18.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
🔩 Nut Sort Blast – Stack, Spin, and Satisfy! The bolts are loose and the nuts (hardware nuts, not food!) are rolling! In Nut Sort Blast, your job is to organize colorful metal nuts, bolts, and screws by color and size across growing vertical rods. It’s a relaxing yet brain-tickling puzzle game where every move brings you closer to the perfect stack—and maybe even unlocks a curious little critter watching from the shadows.
🧰 How to Play:
🔸 Tap to Sort: Move hardware nuts between rods until each one is sorted by color or shape.
🔸 Only One Rule: A nut can only go on a nut of the same type—or an empty rod.
🔸 Stack Smart: Use logic, not speed. No timers, no pressure.
🔸 Finish a Stack: Complete stacks unlock surprises like new themes or adorable helpers.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 48 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 8 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Way too many ads. There's one after every level. I'll watch ads to get extra coins etc. but I won't watch one after every single level. Deleting. Edit to respond: I get ads are part of free play, but it's not necessary to do one after…
Downloaded this from an ad in another game. It looked fun. I am uninstalling within just a few minutes of play time. This has the most RIDICULOUS amount of ads I have EVER seen!! Open the game, get an ad. Finish a puzzle in seconds, get…
fun but so many ads. a little to greedy with ads interrupting every game, then after you pass the game, then another ad to get to next game, then an ad to get to main menu and another ad to get your winnings.
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 0.3.469 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 0.3.469, updated 2026-09-18.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
nut-sort-blastAssessed 2026-10-27 from 400 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.