Rescue Dashi from the belly of the Whale Shark in a risky adventure Dashi is…
TapTapTalesSome warnings 6 users report an aggressive ad load. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 357 reviews.
From our automated analysis, 27 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.83 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.83, updated 2025-11-26.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Rescue Dashi from the belly of the Whale Shark in a risky adventure
Dashi is trapped inside the Whale Shark and you must help the Octonauts rescue her.
Help Captain Barnacles, Peso and Kwazii to rescue Dashi in a thrilling adventure where you must drive the GUP-A ship in the Octonauts underwater world and reach the Whale Shark overcoming all the obstacles that you'll find in your way.
To successfully end your adventure you must overcome 14 funny games until you free Dashi from the Whale Shark's belly.
Besides, you can play and overcome different levels of the games to complete the Octonauts cards album with 14 Gold Cards, 14 Silver Cards with all their vehicles and 104 cards with all the sea animals.
Every time you go into this funny adventure you can find new cards hidden inside the chests that you'll find in the bottom of the sea.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 60 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
357 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
My almost 4 year old loves the show. The games weren't to hard but the advertisement that lead to games were annoying and causing her Octonauts game to stop so I will be deleting app. Ads for kids is ridiculous
Absolutely filled with ads at every turn, that are intentionally difficult to skip for a kid. The payment to remove ads ($5 AUD) loads endlessly to verify purchase and never takes effect. I've tried to buy the ad removal TWICE and still…
Looked good until the constant adds and inappropriate with a person hanging themselves on an app targeting children. Make add free version ad I will pay for it
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.83 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-27 .
The store currently lists version 1.83, updated 2025-11-26.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
octonauts-and-the-whale-sharkAssessed 2026-10-27 from 357 user reviews. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. One independent signal is read — user reviews — and each candidate finding is filed under the source that supports it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.