Serious warnings 2 confirmed warnings. Checked: 1,292 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 30 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 3.59 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 3.59, updated 2026-08-26.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Offline Games: No WiFi - FunOn brings a complete collection of mini games, puzzle games, board games, card games, and timeless classics to one convenient app. Play without internet at home, while traveling, or whenever WiFi is unavailable.
From flights and road trips to subway rides, daily commutes, waiting rooms, and quiet breaks, FunOn is ready whenever you want to play. Open the app, choose a game, and turn the fun on.
Your Offline Games Collection
Find something for every mood. Relax with a classic, solve a quick puzzle, train your brain, challenge an opponent, or enjoy a casual mini game when you only have a few minutes.
Classic Board & Card Games
Ludo
Play the classic board game against friends or AI opponents. Plan your route, protect your pieces, and race to the finish without needing an internet connection.
Solitaire
Enjoy the timeless card game wherever you are.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:c317f7cfc77b1500b2413579c8c7299578213bcef274bb28b5493a71a392e050Aggressive ad load: raised by 35 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 37 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Sells a randomised reward ("Charge It") and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in the app's own text
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app sells randomised rewards — crates, chests, packs, pulls — and states no drop rates or odds anywhere in its own text, so what the money buys is unknowable before paying.
Package artefact
sha256:c317f7cfc77b1500b2413579c8c7299578213bcef274bb28b5493a71a392e050The app's own text says: "Get Premium to hide ads"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The core of the app — not extras — sits behind payment, or previously-free function moved behind a paywall.
Package artefact
sha256:c317f7cfc77b1500b2413579c8c7299578213bcef274bb28b5493a71a392e050The app's own text says: "Sign in"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
Package artefact
sha256:c317f7cfc77b1500b2413579c8c7299578213bcef274bb28b5493a71a392e050The app's own text says: "Downloads waiting for WiFi"
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own copy describes working without a connection — offline mode, downloading for offline use, or content saved for later. Shown because readers filter on it; it is a feature, not a fairness property, and never counts for or against an app.
Package artefact
sha256:c317f7cfc77b1500b2413579c8c7299578213bcef274bb28b5493a71a392e0501,292 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
This is without a doubt the most ad ridden app on Google Play. Any reviews saying very few short ads are either paid or written by the devs themselves. I watched at least 15 ads within 10 minutes of game play. You get at least two un…
soooooo many adds. there was adds every 10 seconds . add removal does not work still had adds. do not suggest this game
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 3.59, scanned 20 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 3.59 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-30 .
The store currently lists version 3.59, updated 2026-08-26.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
fix bugs
No release notes were provided for this version.
offline-games-apple-6470471626Assessed 2026-10-30 from 1,292 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
From the store listing. Billing terms are read from each purchase’s name — the stores don’t publish them — so treat them as a strong hint, not a disclosure.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every recurring plan the store lists is named as weekly, the term read from the purchase names, with a list cut off at the store’s 10-item maximum not assessed; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.