🏹 Old School RuneScape Old School RuneScape is the iconic fantasy MMORPG t…
Jagex Games StudioSome warnings 6 users report price rises. Nothing confirmed. Checked: 628 reviews, the Android app’s code, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 21 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 241.4 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-21 .
The store currently lists version 241.4, updated 2026-10-08.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
🏹 Old School RuneScape
Old School RuneScape is the iconic fantasy MMORPG that defined a generation. Based on the original 2007 version of RuneScape, this is the only major MMO RPG shaped entirely by its players, with new content voted into the game by the community.
With over 300 million accounts created since 2001, RuneScape remains one of the world’s most played online role-playing games. Whether you're new to Gielinor or returning for the nostalgia, Old School RuneScape delivers a deep, evolving sandbox RPG adventure.
⚔️ Master 24 Skills, Including Sailing
Train across 24 unique skills, including the new Sailing skill. Captain your own ship, explore uncharted islands, and uncover powerful rewards on the open sea.
From Combat and Slayer to Fishing, Runecrafting, and Sailing, this open-world MMORPG offers true progression and freedom.
Choose your path:…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Specific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
No advertising or mediation SDK among the 5 SDKs detected in the package
No advertising or mediation SDK of any kind was found in the package.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:e20f8d740d43765114dd29b41fed9fa654c0a54484493da2a4b54e77420e0d7fThe developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Price keeps rising: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 105 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The price of the paid tier has been raised on existing users.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
628 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Subscription is too expensive and keeps increasing. I can't play RS3 fresh start worlds without making a new account and buying a seocnd subscription, all because I tried normal RS3 for an hour years ago? They AI generated the ad for a…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
Android package 241.4, scanned 21 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 241.4 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-21 .
The store currently lists version 241.4, updated 2026-10-08.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
old-school-runescape-google-com-jagex-oldscape-androidAssessed 2026-10-21 from 628 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.