OneState – Live Free, Play Real In OneState, real players run everything — t…
ChillBaseFrom our automated analysis, 10 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.3.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.3.0, updated 2026-10-05.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
OneState – Live Free, Play Real
In OneState, real players run everything — the streets, the businesses, the law. A mobile open-world roleplay set in modern LA, up to 900 of them per server, not NPCs. Find your people in the biggest Social RP community on mobile.
Live Your Role
Create your own story in a living city, explore our highly detailed pocket-sized copy of LA! Be whoever you want to be in that rp life simulator – gangster, police officer, serviceman, medic, CEO of your own business empire. Build your life from the ground up and make your mark in a massive role play open world that never sleeps.
Hustle - Trade - Profit
Start small, dream big. Work your job, flip deals, build your business, and invest in real estate. Rise from the streets to the skyline. In OneState ambition pays off – your hustle defines you.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Bundles 4 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: AppLovin MAX, Chartboost, ironSource / Unity LevelPlay, Unity Ads
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
Package artefact
Appworthy
sha256:38d48025a7a87a876ec71491afbd1dcb6a5851895682a34a292eb1bbccba07ceSpecific evidence of a useful property, within the stated scope.
The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Pay to progress: raised by 8 distinct reviewers (1.0% of 792 reviews scanned)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
792 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Onestate has turned into pay to win madness, you have moderators who are corrupt, cheaters have not been put off with the new 1.3 update. You had the formula cracked and now people are refusing to play. Night time in Onestate is another…
It is a really good game but there are a few things you could add to make it better; more guns and cars which are affordable to non pay to win players,Let players actually run businesses, hire other players, set prices and manage stock…
well as a patron supporter albeit on a much smaller scale compared to some with more$ then brains. Anyhow, the gameplay has gotten far worse then is been the developers have now turned it into almost a complete p2p / p2w mobile bs as most…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
Supporting measurements. They are not a complete list of possible harms or positives. “Not assessed” means we could not measure it — never zero, never a pass.
Android package 1.3.0, scanned 7 Oct 2026. These describe that package, not the current store version.
Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.3.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-10 . The app may have changed since.
The store currently lists version 1.3.0, updated 2026-10-05.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
No release notes were provided for this version.
onestate-rp-google-com-chillgaming-onestateAssessed 2026-10-10 from 792 user reviews, the app's package, the store listing and its privacy label.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. Six independent signals are read — user reviews, SDKs in the app package, the app's own on-screen text, the app manifest, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.