Real store listing. Store data comes from public listings; the assessment type and evidence coverage are labeled on this page.
DiscoverBrowse CategoriesHow it worksMethodologyFor developers
Independent automated assessment · 6 signal sources · 569 reviews scanned · analyzed 2026-10-06.

OSM 26/27 Soccer Manager Game

Gamebasics BV

The new 26/27 season has officially kicked off, and your favourite football c…

4.6 ★2,670,348 ratings
50M+Downloads
4+Age rating
—App size
Free · In-app purchasesIn-app purchases

About this app

The new 26/27 season has officially kicked off, and your favourite football club needs a manager. Online Soccer Manager is a free-to-play football manager game featuring every real league, club, and player from around the world — the most authentic soccer manager simulator you can play on mobile.

Sign your contract and start your football manager career at a club from the Premier League, Serie A, La Liga, or any other league on the planet. Build your dream team at a club like Real Madrid, FC Barcelona, or Liverpool FC — or take an underdog and turn it into a champion.

Once you're in charge, every decision is yours. Build your ideal formation and line-up, then master a deep tactics and strategy system to prepare for every matchday.…

Preview

Real screenshots from the store listing.

8 screenshots
OSM 26/27 Soccer Manager Game screenshot 1
OSM 26/27 Soccer Manager Game screenshot 2
OSM 26/27 Soccer Manager Game screenshot 3
OSM 26/27 Soccer Manager Game screenshot 4
OSM 26/27 Soccer Manager Game screenshot 5
OSM 26/27 Soccer Manager Game screenshot 6
OSM 26/27 Soccer Manager Game screenshot 7
OSM 26/27 Soccer Manager Game screenshot 8

Independent evidence report

The evidence behind this assessment

This is where the page changes from an app-store listing into an evidence report: findings, important reviews, pricing and a dated history.

Automated assessment complete

Which version this describes

When we ran this analysis, and what the store lists now.

This analysis describes version 4.1.9.0 of the app (the version number recorded inside the package we inspected), analyzed 2026-10-06 . The app may have changed since.

The store currently lists version 4.2.0.2, updated 2026-10-06.

The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 4.1.9.0, not the version now listed on the store.

Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:

Version 4.2.0.2 · 2026-10-06

No release notes were provided for this version.

What we measured

Each line is a measurement published as a measurement, never a verdict.

How these are measured

Each line is a measurement, published as a measurement. Where we have not looked, the line says so rather than reading as a zero.

Developer replies to reviews
Replies to at least 1 review in 20
Price in the store description
States no price and billing period
Cancelling, in the store description
Does not say how to cancel
Themes reported by reviewers
2 themes reported
Counted from the reviews we have read for this app. "No theme reported" means no theme reached our reporting threshold — it is not a finding that nothing is wrong with this app, and we do not say it is.
Five-star share of ratings
80–89% five-star
Arithmetic on the stores' own published rating counts. It says nothing about why the ratings fall where they do.

In the package we scanned

From the package we downloaded and read — version 4.1.9.0, scanned 2026-09-23.

Permissions Android classifies as dangerous
None requested
Counted against the eighteen permissions listed in collect-package.ts. A dangerous permission is one Android asks the user to grant; requesting one is not itself a finding.
Analytics or tracking SDKs in the scanned package
3 or more found
Advertising SDKs in the scanned package
10 or more found
Counted as distinct SDKs in the package we scanned. One mediation bundle can contribute several, so this is not a count of advertisers.

Graded bands · predicate set 1.4 · how these are measured

What the analysis found

App-specific findings, grouped by what each one rests on. How they are graded lives on its own page.

Methodology

The catch list 2

Charges we publish at a strength we stand behind: measured from an artefact, agreed by independent sources, or reported by enough users to clear that charge's own published bar.

Multiple ad networks bundled
Measuredfrom SDKs in the app packageartefact e1a07ed15854…
The package embeds several distinct advertising or mediation SDKs — a stack built for ad volume, not for a single house ad.
What we saw: Bundles 16 distinct ad networks / mediation SDKs: Amazon Publisher Services, AppLovin MAX, BidMachine, Chartboost and 12 more
Aggressive ad load
2 independent sources agreefrom user reviews and the app's own on-screen textartefact e1a07ed15854…
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
What we saw: Progress is gated behind watching an ad: "Watch video ads to unlock an extra reward in the shop! You can unlock this reward at most once per day by watching the indicated amount of video ads. Progress is reset after a period of inactivity.…

Positive evidence 1

Things this app does right, published at the same strengths as the catch list.

Developer says data deletion can be requested
Measuredfrom the store listingview evidence
The developer's data-safety disclosure on the store states that users can request deletion of their data, or the app's own text offers a way to delete the account. This restates what the developer declares; it is not a test of whether deletion works. Apple publishes no equivalent disclosure, so on an Apple-only listing only the app's own text can support it.
What we saw: The developer's store data-safety disclosure states that data deletion can be requested; we have not seen a deletion control in the app's own text

One source only — shown, not confirmed 1

A single kind of evidence. We publish these because withholding them would be the bigger distortion, and we do not treat any of them as a finding we stand behind.

Reported by users: Pay to progress
One source onlyShown, not confirmed — the only source is user reviews.view evidence
Advancement or competition is gated behind spending money rather than playing.
What we saw: Pay to progress: raised by 7 distinct reviewers (1.2% of 569 reviews scanned)

Highlighted reviews

Representative public review excerpts shown as user reports, not Appworthy audit evidence.

Aggressive ad load
“deleted because of the annoying pop up ads”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-08-14
Aggressive ad load
“Love the game but is there any reason why you don't add an option to pay to remove ALL ads, including the training, stadium and scout speed up ads?”
4★ · Google Play · 2026-09-19
Aggressive ad load
“this game sucks too many ads made only for $ it's almost impossible to get coins without ads 25 coins for 1 day universal trainer and also always missclick that and use it for the only 25 coins that i have by mistake and there no…”
1★ · Google Play · 2026-09-08

Assessment & version history

App changes and Appworthy events in one timeline.

Store listing updated to version 4.2.0.2.

What this app sells

Useful store-disclosed pricing, kept below the app listing.

Items shown0
Lowest—
Highest—

Google Play does not publish per-purchase prices.