Too little checked to say Only 400 reviews read, too few to say.
From our automated analysis, 25 Oct 2026.
This analysis describes version 5.1.8 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 5.1.8, updated 2026-08-26.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
A material designed offline music player for android
Features :
- Android auto support
- Chromecast support
- Gapless and Crossfade playback support
- Multiple Now playing themes (more coming in the future updates)
- Fade in/Fade out music when pause/resume playback
- Normal and synchronized lyrics support
- Multiple artists support (Split artists with custom separators)
- Multiple genres support (Split genres with custom separators)
- Download and edit lyrics and tags from the app itself
- Amoled theme
- Change accent color and highlight color
- Sleep timer
- Replay gain support
- Inbuilt equalizer
- 5+ clean and minimal widgets
- custom playlist support (No more worrying about playlists getting deleted automatically)
- Import and export playlists.
- Multiple sorting options
- Light, dark, battery saver and system default theme support
- Dedicated folders section(view your music files…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Reviewers report clear pricing: raised by 6 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 67 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own text offers a one-time or lifetime purchase, or reviewers report that the price is stated clearly.
Nothing was published as a thing to watch for in this assessment. That is not a finding that nothing is wrong with the app.
400 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
No ads forced on you, premium is one time purchase, while all the features you need are already free! It's clear the developers care about your offline experience. you'll need no other players with this one
Easy to use and quite flexible with many settings to tinker with, while also being great for those who just want a music player that just works I'd highly recommend this player for its built in tag editor, fast performance and good out of…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 5.1.8 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-25 .
The store currently lists version 5.1.8, updated 2026-08-26.
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
No release notes were provided for this version.
Appworthy
oto-musicAssessed 2026-10-25 from 400 user reviews. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
This assessment is produced automatically. One independent signal is read — user reviews — and each candidate finding is filed under the source that supports it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.