Some warnings 1 confirmed warning, and users report 1 more thing. Checked: 500 reviews, the store listing and the privacy label.
From our automated analysis, 24 Oct 2026. Every label links to its evidence in the full report below.
This analysis describes version 1.3.7 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 1.3.8, updated 2026-10-23.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 1.3.7, not the version now listed on the store.
The developer’s release notes for the newer versions, where we hold them, are in Versions and dates analysed.
Store screenshots supplied by the developer.
Track your fitness journey with PaceFit, the ultimate pedometer app designed to empower your health and wellness!
PaceFit turns your daily steps into gift cards and real prizes. Stay active, finish tasks, and redeem what you earn — just by walking.
1.Step Monitoring: Monitor your daily step count and view trends over three data dimensions: daily, weekly, and monthly. Stay motivated by visualizing your progress over time.
2.Monthly Calendar: Easily check your walking statistics for the entire month with our intuitive calendar view. Gain insights into your activity levels and set new goals.
3.Mood & Diet & Sports Recording: Enhance your well-being by adding daily records of your mood, diet, and exercise.…
From the developer’s store description.
For developers and the curious
The evidence, sources, measurements and versions behind every label above.
Findings that met the published evidence standard.
Aggressive ad load: raised by 57 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 9 reviews we read)
Advertising volume or placement that interrupts normal use: ads between every action, unskippable or forced full-screen ads.
Open observations that have not cleared the evidence bar.
Misleading advertising: raised by 5 distinct reviewers (about 1 in 100 reviews we read)
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
Reviewers repeatedly report that the app is not what its advertising showed. We never see the ad creative itself, so nothing we collect can corroborate or refute this — it is published as an attributed user report: what reviewers say, and how many of them said it.
The store privacy disclosure (6 entries) links no contact details or identifiers to the user — consistent with an app that does not require an account. Self-reported by the developer.
This observation has not cleared the required evidence standard.
The app's own screens offer a way past sign-up — guest access, skipping, or browsing before registering — rather than gating the product behind an account. The store's privacy disclosure is checked alongside it: that disclosure is self-reported, so it corroborates this credit rather than establishing it.
500 reviews read for this analysis. Each observation keeps the sample and store it was based on.
Raised by 57 distinct reviewers — about 1 in 9 reviews we read on this store leg (App Store).
Guaranteed SCAM — You will never see any money from this app it’s full of ads and false. Months later.. you will be stuck needing fractions to cash out. I wont bother keeping this app
SCAM!!!! — Beware it looks good at first I probably watchers maybe 200 ads whilst walking and earning which was fine adds suck but hey I get it well I finally reached the $30 limit went to withdraw and all of a sudden it says I need 40 or…
Don’t expect to ever cash out. — I have finally gotten to the 49th fragment that is required to move the money. But now I am stuck. I have been watching. 100 ads for it to never give the final fragment. I guess this is never going to…
Scam — I’ve been doing this for 4 months and the first 2 months were good when I was getting the fragments then once I got to 46 fragments it stopped and now 2 months later it still at 46 this is a scam to only build up there profit and…
Horrible — You’re unable to withdraw if you don’t crack enough eggs. Ridiculous false advertisement. I’m deleting this app today.
Don’t do it! — I only put this as five stars so people will see it. They bait and switch you. I have over $60 waiting to cash out but the catch is you have to smash golden eggs and get fragments to cash out. You need 50 fragments for $30…
A sampled review illustrates one person’s experience. It does not establish a finding on its own.
“Not assessed” means we could not measure it. It is never a zero and never a pass.
No package has been scanned for this app, so nothing is published about what it ships. That is an absence of evidence, not a finding.
Supporting measurements: not a complete list of possible harms or positives. Measurement vocabulary 1.4 · how these are measured
This analysis describes version 1.3.7 of the app, analyzed 2026-10-24 .
The store currently lists version 1.3.8, updated 2026-10-23.
The app has been updated since this analysis. The findings on this page describe version 1.3.7, not the version now listed on the store.
Release notes for the newer versions, in the developer’s own words:
Fixed several bugs
Each store’s release notes, as the developer wrote them. They are the developer’s words, not ours.
Fixed several bugs
Updated the app description and added links to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service
Appworthy
pacefitAssessed 2026-10-24 from 500 user reviews, the store listing and its privacy label. We have not scanned the app's package, so nothing on this page was read from inside the app itself.
What the stores publish. Store ratings are the stores’ numbers, not Appworthy’s, and are never averaged across stores.
No itemized purchase list is available for this listing.
This assessment is produced automatically. Three independent signals are read — user reviews, the store listing and the store privacy disclosure — and each candidate finding is filed under the sources that support it.
No charge stands on one kind of evidence — with one published exception. A finding is either a measured fact that anyone can reproduce (an ad SDK is in the package; every subscription bills weekly; the privacy label omits a tracker we can see), or it is an interpretation — and an interpretation needs independent sources to agree before it reaches the catch list. The exception is a harm only users can see: a charge may publish from reviews alone, as “Reported by N users”, once enough reviewers raise it to clear that charge’s own published bar. That agreement rule is what replaced the human reviewer, not a model’s confidence.
There is no overall score, on purpose. A 0–99 number was published here until 2026-09-15. It was withdrawn because it discriminated too weakly to be the instrument — 44.7% of every pair of apps tied — and because a single number is a verdict where a count is an observation. What publishes instead is a row of measurements, each of which says what was counted and, where we could not look, says that instead.
Findings under One source only are real reports we do not stand behind as findings. They are shown because withholding them entirely would hide a genuine complaint, and labelled because publishing them as charges would be an accusation off a single source.
Write to [email protected], or use the form. Name the finding, the app version and the evidence that needs correcting. Factual corrections are free and never depend on buying anything.